From the October 1998 issue

What type of lighting emits the least amount of light pollution?

Peter Blado, Tacoma, Washington
By | Published: October 1, 1998 | Last updated on May 18, 2023
Light Pollution in Eastern North America
October 1998
First, use a good lighting fixture, one that is a “full cutoff.” That means there is no direct upgoing light at all. It generally also means there is very little light just below the horizontal, which is the kind of light that causes glare. Too many installations produce a lot of glare, and that compromises safety and security, not to mention the blinding obnoxious light. Essentially all lighting manufacturers make good full cutoff fixtures, and there is no excuse not to use them.

Second, use the correct amount of light. Overkill does not help visibility and it can waste a lot of energy. Going from darker areas to overlit areas means the eye does not adapt to the bright areas, and visibility is compromised. Follow the published guidelines of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.

If you have chosen a good light fixture and used the appropriate amount of light, the choice of the light source is less important. In the vicinity of major observatories, and for those who want the maximum energy savings, one should use low pressure sodium (LPS) lights. These lights are essentially monochromatic, so astronomers can filter their emission out, and the sky remains dark at all other wavelengths. LPS is also the most energy-efficient light source. Many astronomers, however, prefer to use high pressure sodium (a sort of amber light) or metal halide (whitish) sources. HPS is fairly energy efficient, and metal halide is the most energy efficient of the white light sources.

Dark skies need our help. Those with additional interest can go to the International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) website (, which has links to other sites, including many in the lighting industry. Or write IDA at:

International Dark-Sky Association
3225 N. First Avenue
Tucson, AZ 85719.