NASA scientists are on the trail of Iapetus’ mysterious dark side, which seems to be home to a bizarre “runaway” process that is transporting vaporized water ice from the dark areas to the white areas of the Saturnian moon.
This “thermal segregation” model may explain many details of the moon’s strange and dramatically two-toned appearance, which have been revealed exquisitely in images collected during a recent close flyby of Iapetus by NASA’s Cassini spacecraft.
Infrared observations from the flyby confirm that the dark material is warm enough (approximately –230 degrees Fahrenheit or 127 Kelvin) for very slow release of water vapor from water ice, and this process is probably a major factor in determining the distinct brightness boundaries.
“The side of Iapetus that faces forward in its orbit around Saturn is being darkened by some mysterious process,” said John Spencer, Cassini scientist with the composite infrared spectrometer team from the Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado.
Using multiple instruments on Cassini, scientists are piecing together a complex story to explain the bright and dark faces of Iapetus. But yet to be fully understood is where the dark material is coming from. Is it native or from outside the moon? It has long been hypothesized that this material did not originate from within Iapetus, but instead was derived from other moons orbiting at a much greater distance from Saturn in a direction opposite to Iapetus.
Scientists are now converging on the notion that the darkening process in fact began in this manner, and that thermal effects subsequently enhanced the contrast to what we see today.
“It’s interesting to ponder that a more than 30-year-old idea might still help explain the brightness difference on Iapetus,” said Tilmann Denk, Cassini imaging scientist at the Free University in Berlin, Germany. “Dusty material spiraling in from outer moons hits Iapetus head-on, and causes the forward-facing side of Iapetus to look different than the rest of the moon.”
Once the leading side is even slightly dark, thermal segregation can proceed rapidly. A dark surface will absorb more sunlight and warm up, explains Spencer, so the water ice on the surface evaporates. The water vapor then condenses on the nearest cold spot, which could be Iapetus’s poles, and possibly bright, icy areas at lower latitudes on the side of the moon facing in the opposite direction of its orbit. So the dark stuff loses its surface ice and gets darker, and the bright stuff accumulates ice and gets brighter, in a runaway process.
Scientists say the result is that there are virtually no shades of gray on Iapetus. There is only white and very dark.
Ultraviolet data also show a non-ice component in the bright, white regions of Iapetus. Spectroscopic analysis will reveal whether the composition of the material on the dark hemisphere is the same as the dark material that is present within the bright terrain.
“The ultraviolet data tell us a lot about where the water ice is and where the non-water ice stuff is. At first glance, the two populations do not appear to be present in the pattern we expected, which is very interesting,” said Amanda Hendrix, Cassini scientist on the ultraviolet imaging spectrograph team at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California.
Because of the presence of very small craters that excavate the bright ice beneath, scientists also believe that the dark material is thin, a result consistent with previous Cassini radar results. But some local areas may be thicker. The dark material seems to lie on top of the bright region, consistent with the idea that it is a residual left behind by the sublimated water ice.
Some other mysteries are coming together. There are more data on the signature mountain ridge that gives Iapetus its “walnut” appearance. In some places it appears subdued.
One big question that remains is why it does not go all the way around. Was it partially destroyed after it formed, or did it never extend all the way around the moon? Scientists have ruled out that it is a youthful feature because it is pitted with craters, indicating it is old. And the ridge looks too solid and competent to be the result of an equatorial ring around the moon collapsing onto its surface. The ring theory cannot explain features that look like tectonic structures in the new high resolution images.