NASA study shows asteroid impacts may have accelerated life on Earth
Impacts could have created subsurface habitats for life, such as extensive networks of cracks or even hydrothermal vents.
Provided by NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C.
May 21, 2009
An intense asteroid bombardment nearly 4 billion years ago may not have sterilized the early Earth as completely as previously thought, according to a NASA-funded study. The asteroids, some the size of Kansas, possibly even provided a boost for early life.
The study focused on a particularly cataclysmic occurrence known as the Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB). This event occurred approximately 3.9 billion years ago and lasted 20 to 200 million years. Oleg Abramov and Stephen J. Mojzsis, astrobiologists at the University of Colorado's Department of Geological Sciences in Boulder, have reported on the results of a computer modeling project designed to study the heating of Earth by the bombardment.
Results from their project show that while the LHB might have generated enough heat to sterilize Earth's surface, microbial life in subsurface and underwater environments almost certainly would have survived.
"Exactly when life originated on Earth is a hotly debated topic," said Michael H. New, the astrobiology discipline scientist and manager of the Exobiology and Evolutionary Biology Program at NASA Headquarters in Washington. "These findings are significant because they indicate that if life had begun before the LHB or some time prior to 4 billion years ago, it could have survived in limited refuges and then expanded to fill our world."
"Our new results point to the possibility life could have emerged about the same time that evidence for our planet's oceans first appeared," said Mojzsis, principal investigator of the project.
A growing scientific consensus is that during our solar system's formation, planetary bodies were pummeled by debris throughout the LHB. A visual record of the event is preserved in the form of the scarred face of our Moon. On Earth, all traces of the bombardment appear to have been erased by rock recycling forces like weathering, volcanoes, or other conditions that cause the crust to move or change.
Surface habitats for microbial life on early Earth would have been destroyed repeatedly by the bombardment. However, at the same time, impacts could have created subsurface habitats for life, such as extensive networks of cracks or even hydrothermal vents. Any existing microbial life on Earth could have found refuge in these habitats. If life had not yet emerged on Earth by the time of the bombardment, these new subsurface environments could have been the place where terrestrial life emerged.
"Even under the most extreme conditions we imposed on our model, the bombardment could not have sterilized Earth completely," said Abramov. "Our results are in line with the scientific consensus that hyperthermophilic, or heat-loving, microbes could have been the earliest life forms on Earth, or survivors from an even more ancient biosphere. The results also support the potential for the persistence of microbial biospheres on other planetary bodies whose surfaces were reworked by the bombardment, including Mars."