Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

NASA discovers first Earth-sized planets beyond our solar system

The discovery marks the next important milestone in the ultimate search for planets like Earth.
By Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. Published: December 21, 2011
Earth-sized planets
This chart compares the first Earth-sized planets found around a Sun-like star to planets in our own solar system, Earth and Venus. NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech
NASA’s Kepler mission has discovered the first Earth-sized planets orbiting a Sun-like star outside our solar system. The planets, called Kepler-20e and Kepler-20f, are too close to their star to be in the habitable zone where liquid water could exist on a planet’s surface, but they are the smallest exoplanets ever confirmed around a star like our Sun.

The discovery marks the next important milestone in the ultimate search for planets like Earth. The new planets are thought to be rocky. Kepler-20e is slightly smaller than Venus, measuring 0.87 times the radius of Earth. Kepler-20f is slightly larger than Earth, measuring 1.03 times its radius. Both planets reside in a five-planet system called Kepler-20, approximately 1,000 light-years away in the constellation Lyra.

Kepler-20e orbits its parent star every 6.1 days and Kepler-20f every
19.6 days. These short orbital periods mean very hot, inhospitable worlds. Kepler-20f, at 800° Fahrenheit (427° Celsius), is similar to an average day on the planet Mercury. The surface temperature of Kepler-20e, at more than 1,400° Fahrenheit (760° Celsius), would melt glass.

“The primary goal of the Kepler mission is to find Earth-sized planets in the habitable zone,” said Francois Fressin from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “This discovery demonstrates for the first time that Earth-sized planets exist around other stars, and that we are able to detect them.”

The Kepler-20 system includes three other planets that are larger than Earth but smaller than Neptune. Kepler-20b, the closest planet, Kepler-20c, the third planet, and Kepler-20d, the fifth planet, orbit their star every 3.7, 10.9, and 77.6 days, respectively. All five planets have orbits lying roughly within Mercury’s orbit in our solar system. The host star belongs to the same G-type class as our Sun, although it is slightly smaller and cooler.

The system has an unexpected arrangement. In our solar system, small, rocky worlds orbit close to the Sun and large, gaseous worlds orbit farther out. In comparison, the planets of Kepler-20 are organized in alternating size: large, small, large, small, and large.

“The Kepler data are showing us some planetary systems have arrangements of planets very different from that seen in our solar system,” said Jack Lissauer from NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California. “The analysis of Kepler data continues to reveal new insights about the diversity of planets and planetary systems within our galaxy.”

Scientists are not certain how the system evolved, but they do not think the planets formed in their existing locations. They theorize that the planets formed farther from their star and then migrated inward, likely through interactions with the disk of material from which they originated. This allowed the worlds to maintain their regular spacing despite alternating sizes.

The Kepler space telescope detects planets and planet candidates by measuring dips in the brightness of more than 150,000 stars to search for worlds crossing in front of — or transiting — their stars. The Kepler science team requires at least three transits to verify a signal as a planet.

The Kepler team uses ground-based telescopes and the Spitzer Space Telescope to review observations on planet candidates the Kepler spacecraft finds. The star field Kepler observes in the constellations Cygnus and Lyra can be seen only from ground-based observatories in spring through early fall. The data from these other observations help determine which candidates can be validated as planets.

To validate Kepler-20e and Kepler-20f, astronomers used a computer program called Blender, which runs simulations to help rule out other astrophysical phenomena masquerading as a planet.

On December 5, the team announced the discovery of Kepler-22b in the habitable zone of its parent star. It is likely to be too large to have a rocky surface. While Kepler-20e and Kepler-20f are Earth-sized, they are too close to their parent star to have liquid water on the surface.

“In the cosmic game of hide and seek, finding planets with just the right size and just the right temperature seems only a matter of time,” said Natalie Batalha from San Jose State University, California. “We are on the edge of our seats knowing that Kepler’s most anticipated discoveries are still to come.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
ELLEN STEENS from CALIFORNIA said:
Natalie Batalha, I am on the edge of my seat with you. I am pulling for you all the way.
STEPHEN ARMSTRONG from CALIFORNIA said:
OK............."Kepler-20b, the closest planet, Kepler-20c, the third planet, and Kepler-20d, the fifth planet, orbit their star every 3.7, 10.9, and 77.6 days", and "Kepler-20e orbits its parent star every 6.1 days and Kepler-20f every
19.6 days" So, that's B,E,C,F, and then D for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th planets outward from their star. WHAT?!?!? Who's naming these planets? Hopefully, the "alpha"-nomenclature system will yield to a more understandable, and proper, "numeric"-nomenclature system of planet designations once all possible planets have been discovered in each star system. In other words, hopefully the letters are temporary. That's like calling Earth Sol-1a, when we are clearly Sol-1c (or even Sol 3)!!
5 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL said:
Great work, Kepler!!!
5 stars
SAM NAUMAN from TEXAS said:
O.K. 1000 light years away, that means that we can send them a message and get an answer in 4000 AD. By then we would have forgotten that we sent any messages. Is there life out there? probably. The only thing special about us is that we think we are special. Looking through a 10" Dobsonian telescope tells us that we are one of many many billions. Well that should burst our bubble and bring us down to earth.
5 stars
JAMES HEADY from MICHIGAN said:
I love to read about progress being made on finding planets. I just hope I`m still alive when some are found with life on them. Keep up the good work.
GUILMAR A LOPEZ from NEW JERSEY said:
I THINK THERE ARE MILLIONS OF PLANETS OUT THERE, Earth is not the only one that sustains life. but we will find out in the year 2,071
4 stars
LARRY GARNER from FLORIDA said:
I think that it awsome that we can now find planets that small. However, everyone seems to be looking for planets our size around a star like ours. What if we think outside the box? It seems to me that it shouldn't matter how big or small it is, just that it is solid (Rocky type) and is with in the stars habitable zone. For that matter, why does it have to be life like u? (Maybe we are the oddballs). We know (life) can exsist with different chemical make ups, so just finding something that grows or moves would be ground breaking. Of course the only problem with that is the fact that I do not think we have the abilaty to look for that yet???
5 stars
KRIS GRAUEL from TENNESSEE said:
Really great stuff! Only a matter of time.
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
It's good that they found one, or two, or whatever number. But did anyone ever doubt that there were trillions of planets like Earth out there? Like the Sun is special. Sure it is. Only that you can get a good view of its' surface from your back patio.
It is like finding a black hole, super massive or otherwise, and asking, "You think there may be more?" Duh. Ya think?
Watch the big fight that will break out if they find no evidence of life on Mars, or any moons out there. Some folks will begin to question if Earth is unique in having life. Sure it is. We're special. (End sarcasm.)
It is amazing that they can detect them at such distances. Decades ago, I wouldn't have thought that to be possible.
IVAN RIVADENEIRA II said:
Great article, congratulations
12
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me