Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Earth-like planets are right next door

Astronomers have found that 6 percent of red dwarf stars have habitable Earth-sized planets.
By Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts Published: February 6, 2013
Habitable-planet
This artist’s conception shows a hypothetical habitable planet with two moons orbiting a red dwarf star. Astronomers have found that 6 percent of all red dwarf stars have an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone, which is warm enough for liquid water on the planet’s surface. Since red dwarf stars are so common, then statistically the closest Earth-like planet should be only 13 light-years away. // David A. Aguilar (CfA)
Using publicly available data from NASA’s Kepler space telescope, astronomers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) in Cambridge, Massachusetts, have found that 6 percent of red dwarf stars have habitable Earth-sized planets. Since red dwarfs are the most common stars in our galaxy, the closest Earth-like planet could be just 13 light-years away.

“We thought we would have to search vast distances to find an Earth-like planet. Now, we realize another Earth is probably in our own backyard waiting to be spotted,” said Courtney Dressing from CfA.

Red dwarf stars are smaller, cooler, and fainter than our Sun. An average red dwarf is only one-third as large and one-thousandth as bright as the Sun. From Earth, no red dwarf is visible to the naked eye.

Despite their dimness, these stars are good places to look for Earth-like planets. Red dwarfs make up three out of every four stars in our galaxy for a total of at least 75 billion. The signal of a transiting planet is larger since the star itself is smaller, so an Earth-sized world blocks more of the star’s disk. And since a planet has to orbit a cool star closer in order to be in the habitable zone, it’s more likely to transit from our point of view.

Dressing culled the Kepler catalog of 158,000 target stars to identify all the red dwarfs. She then reanalyzed those stars to calculate more accurate sizes and temperatures. She found that almost all of those stars were smaller and cooler than previously thought.

Since the size of a transiting planet is determined relative to the star size, based on how much of the star’s disk the planet covers, shrinking the star shrinks the planet. And a cooler star will have a tighter habitable zone.

Dressing identified 95 planetary candidates orbiting red dwarf stars. This implied that at least 60 percent of such stars have planets smaller than Neptune. However, most weren’t quite the right size or temperature to be considered truly Earth-like. Three planetary candidates were both warm and approximately Earth-sized. Statistically, this means that 6 percent of all red dwarf stars should have an Earth-like planet.

“We now know the rate of occurrence of habitable planets around the most common stars in our galaxy,” said David Charbonneau from CfA. “That rate implies that it will be significantly easier to search for life beyond the solar system than we previously thought.”

Locating nearby Earth-like worlds may require a dedicated small space telescope or a large network of ground-based telescopes. Follow-up studies with instruments like the Giant Magellan Telescope and James Webb Space Telescope could tell scientists whether any warm, transiting planets have an atmosphere and further probe its chemistry.

Such a world would be different from our own. Orbiting so close to its star, the planet would probably be tidally locked. However, that doesn’t prohibit life since a reasonably thick atmosphere or deep ocean could transport heat around the planet. And while young red dwarf stars emit strong flares of ultraviolet light, an atmosphere could protect life on the planet’s surface. In fact, such stresses could help life evolve. “You don’t need an Earth clone to have life,” said Dressing.

Since red dwarf stars live much longer than Sun-like stars, this discovery raises the interesting possibility that life on such a planet would be much older and more evolved than life on Earth. “We might find an Earth that’s 10 billion years old,” said Charbonneau.

The three habitable-zone planetary candidates identified in this study are Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) 1422.02, which is 90 percent the size of Earth in a 20-day orbit; KOI 2626.01, 1.4 times the size of Earth in a 38-day orbit; and KOI 854.01, 1.7 times the size of Earth in a 56-day orbit. All three are located about 300 to 600 light-years away and orbit stars with temperatures between 5700° and 5900° Fahrenheit (3100° and 3300° Celsius). For comparison, our Sun’s surface is 10000° F (5500° C).

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
THOM DOANE from ILLINOIS said:
If such a planet was tidally locked perhaps the sunny side would be too hot for life and the far side would be too cold. But there would be a permanent and temperate "ring" of twilight all the way around the planet where the sides meet that could be just right for life to develop. On the other hand, if life there is anything like life here we'd probably find extremophiles happily enjoying the heat and the cold.
4 stars
KEVIN STARNES from COLORADO said:
If time travel were possible I'd be torn between two remarkable choices: To jump back 100 million years to see dinosaurs roaming the Earth or to jump forward 500 years when FTL travel may be a reality. How cool would it be to see one of these Earth-like planets up close!? Or better still, landing on one!
4 stars
DEREK EVANS from SPAIN said:
About evolved 'intelligent' life: Courtney Dressing's remark about not needing an Earth clone to produce life is quite telling, but though it is a strong point in favour of a planet producing any sort of life, I find the wild optimism of the Cosmic Pro-Lifers (if I may call them that) unconvincing. It may be thought of as a negative turn of mind on my part but there is so much in the cosmos that mitigates against life,especailly evolving as far as we have. Have we detected any 'artifactual' radio signals? - no. Perhaps it is possible that, around an older, probably G type star, somewhere in the universe (how big is that!), there is a civilization far in advance of us technologically. But no trace yet - I am aware how 'slowly' radio signals travel in relation to the distances involved but even so I think that is an indication of how rare evolved life is - it is too far away and too improbable for us ever to detect. let alone communicate with.
Perhaps the univers was designed that way..........
5 stars
SAM NAUMAN from TEXAS said:
Now we have some neighbors to visit. Lets see; there are the ones living in the light, those living in the dark and the don't knows in between. This seems so much like earth already.
4 stars
CHARLES L JANES from CALIFORNIA said:
this is a great article. now that an exoplanet has been found at alpha centauri should not a super great effort be made on finding an earth sized planet there? just think what it would mean to us if one were found in the habital zone!
5 stars
RON CHINCHEN from AUSTRALIA (NSW) said:
Would be a very strange world indeed.

If it developed a form of life and a mainly oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere existed with oceans and continents it would suggest the likelihood of at least two totally different life forms.

The equator would be a pole directly facing the sun if tidally locked and temperatures would reduce the further from that pole you travelled.

On the opposite side would a cold pole and temperatures would increase the further you moved from it.

Half the world would be in perpetual sunlight, half in perpetual dark. With no coriolis effect currents would probably be a constant flow of hot air above heading to the dark pole and a cold current below flowing directly to the hot pole. Of course seas would vary this somewhat. But if life existed, it would almost certainly be in at least two totally different forms, one for sunlight, one for the dark. The imagination runs wild with such a world.
4 stars
KRIS GRAUEL from TENNESSEE said:
I enjoyed this article. But why is it not Proxima Centauri, only 4 light years away?
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me