Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Armchair astronomers find planet in four-star system

The planet was first identified by citizen scientists participating in Planet Hunters, a Yale-led program that enlists the public to review astronomical data from NASA's Kepler spacecraft for signs of planets.
By Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut Published: October 16, 2012
PH1 planetary system
A family portrait of the PH1 planetary system. PH1 is depicted in this artist's rendition with the pair of eclipsing stars it orbits. The planet transits in front the larger of the two stars approximately every 138 days. Off in the distance, well beyond PH1's orbit, resides a second pair of stars bound to the planetary system. // Credit: Haven Giguere/Yale Univ.
A joint effort of citizen scientists and professional astronomers has led to the first reported case of a planet orbiting twin suns that in turn is orbited by a second distant pair of stars.

Aided by volunteers using the Planethunters.org website, a Yale-led international team of astronomers identified and confirmed discovery of the phenomenon — called a circumbinary planet in a four-star system.

Only six planets are known to orbit two stars, according to researchers, and none of these are orbited by distant stellar companions.

"Circumbinary planets are the extremes of planet formation," said Meg Schwamb from Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. "The discovery of these systems is forcing us to go back to the drawing board to understand how such planets can assemble and evolve in these dynamically challenging environments."

Dubbed PH1, the planet was first identified by citizen scientists participating in Planet Hunters, a Yale-led program that enlists the public to review astronomical data from NASA's Kepler spacecraft for signs of planets. It is the project's first confirmed planet.

The volunteers, Kian Jek of San Francisco, California, and Robert Gagliano of Cottonwood, Arizona, spotted faint dips in light caused by the planet as it passed in front of its parent stars, a common method of finding extrasolar planets. Schwamb led the team of professional astronomers that confirmed the discovery and characterized the planet, following observations from the Keck telescopes on Mauna Kea, Hawaii. PH1 is a gas giant with a radius about 6.2 times that of Earth, making it a bit bigger than Neptune.

"Planet Hunters is a symbiotic project, pairing the discovery power of the people with follow-up by a team of astronomers," said Debra Fischer of Yale. "This unique system might have been entirely missed if not for the sharp eyes of the public."

PH1 orbits outside the 20-day orbit of a pair of eclipsing stars that are 1.5 and 0.41 times the mass of the Sun. It revolves around its host stars roughly every 138 days. Beyond the planet's orbit at about 1,000 astronomical units — roughly 1,000 times the distance between Earth and the Sun — is a second pair of stars orbiting the planetary system.

"The thousands of people who are involved with Planet Hunters are performing a valuable service," said Jerome Orosz from San Diego State University. "Many of the automated techniques used to find interesting features in the Kepler data don't always work as efficiently as we would like. The hard work of the Planet Hunters helps ensure that important discoveries are not falling through the cracks."

Gagliano, one of the two citizen scientists involved in the discovery, said he was "absolutely ecstatic to spot a small dip in the eclipsing binary star's light curve from the Kepler telescope, the signature of a potential new circumbinary planet, Tatooine. It's a great honor to be a Planet Hunter, citizen scientist, and work hand in hand with professional astronomers, making a real contribution to science."

"It still continues to astonish me how we can detect, let alone glean so much information, about another planet thousands of light-years away just by studying the light from its parent star," said Jek.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
STEPHEN ARMSTRONG from CALIFORNIA said:
Wayne, check out the "Ask Astro" link at the top of this webpage, left hand column.

My open question to Mr. Gagliano is: Who decided that the first circumbinary planet discovered will be called Tatooine? Do we REALLY want anything even REMOTELY related to Jar-Jar Binks in our astronomical maps? The movie's almost 40, kids. Let it go.....
4 stars
DAVID LECLERE from INDIANA said:
Chris Baker: I believe you are thinking correctly. The light curve would be quite complex thus, difficult to catch with software looking at the data. That explains the following paragraph from the article.:

"The thousands of people who are involved with Planet Hunters are performing a valuable service," said Jerome Orosz from San Diego State University. "Many of the automated techniques used to find interesting features in the Kepler data don't always work as efficiently as we would like. The hard work of the Planet Hunters helps ensure that important discoveries are not falling through the cracks."

Sometimes it still takes a human to do the hard stuff. ;-)

The article doesn't specifically say, but I suspect the system was confirmed as a binary due to the light curve. The stars are probably too close together to resolve optically. Therefore, if I'm thinking correctly, everything known about this system is based on changes in the light from the brightest star.

Someone, please correct me if I'm wrong.
5 stars
LARS LINDSTROM from SWEDEN said:
Fascinating! One wonders, though, about the stability of the orbit. I remember the 3-body problem and its differential equations, which were tough enough to master in the pre-computer ages of my youth. Here we have at least 5 heavy bodies, and I presume the computing of a stable orbit would be right horrendous to tackle. But thanks to to-day´s computers it might be a piece of cake. Anyway, it seems the universe can come up with endless variations on the planetary theme!
5 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL from UNITED KINGDOM said:
Fascinating to know that planets can exist in almost any complex stellar system! What extraordinary seasons such a planet must have!
WAYNE HEIDLEBAUGH from OREGON said:
I find this article fasinating. I would like to submit the folowing
question to the "ask Astro" colnm.
With all the discoverie by the Kepler space craft, we can't see those
planets orbitting stars but we know their there by the transit affect
and a star's woble, but how can you posibly know what the conditions are on those planet if we can't see them?

Wayne Heidlebaugh Milwaukie OR.
4 stars
CHRIS R BAKER from CALIFORNIA said:
Ok, so they are eclipsing binary stars that answers my question about whether or not it transits both of the primaries, or does it? But it occurs to me that it might be just far enough skewed in it's orbit that it doesn't actually eclipse both of them every time it orbits. Does it? If it eclipses the primaries while the smaller is eclipsing the larger, then would you get a double dip where the light goes down for a while then goes down again as the planet transits the smaller. But if it doesn't transit the smaller every time it transits the larger but they are both transiting the larger at the same time, you would get a dip for the planet, then.... Oh wait. The star transits much faster than the planet so the planet would be transiting the larger primary (PA, for Primary A) and then the smaller star or Primary B (PB) would start it's transit, and either go between us and the Planet or not. If PB is on being eclipsed by PA, it doesn't matter if they line up or not. Right? What kind of brightness dips can you get from these 3? Do either or both of the distant pair eclipse the PA/PB pair or the Planet? No matter how the primary 3 bodies eclipse/transit each other there must be at least 5 or 6 possible light curves. I'd like to see this described fully. Any chance of that happening?
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me