Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

The older we get, the less we know — cosmologically

New calculations show that the ideal time to study the cosmos was more than 13 billion years ago, just about 500 million years after the Big Bang.
By Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts Published: May 23, 2012
Cosmos
New research finds that the ideal time to study the cosmos was more than 13 billion years ago, just about 500 million years after the Big Bang — the era (shown in this artist's conception) when the first stars and galaxies began to form. Since information about the early universe is lost when the first galaxies are made, the best time to view cosmic perturbations is right when stars began to form. Modern observers can still access this nascent era from a distance by using surveys designed to detect 21-cm radio emission from hydrogen gas at those early times. Credit: CfA
The universe is a marvelously complex place, filled with galaxies and larger-scale structures that have evolved over its 13.7-billion-year history. Those began as small perturbations of matter that grew over time, like ripples in a pond, as the universe expanded. By observing the large-scale cosmic wrinkles now, we can learn about the initial conditions of the universe. But is now really the best time to look, or would we get better information billions of years into the future — or the past?

New calculations by Harvard theorist Avi Loeb show that the ideal time to study the cosmos was more than 13 billion years ago, just about 500 million years after the Big Bang. The farther into the future you go from that time, the more information you lose about the early universe.

"I'm glad to be a cosmologist at a cosmic time when we can still recover some of the clues about how the universe started," Loeb said.

Two competing processes define the best time to observe the cosmos. In the young universe, the cosmic horizon is closer to you, so you see less. As the universe ages, you can see more of it because there's been time for light from more-distant regions to travel to you. However, in the older and more evolved universe, matter has collapsed to make gravitationally bound objects. This "muddies the waters" of the cosmic pond because you lose memory of initial conditions on small scales. The two effects counter each other — the first grows better as the second grows worse.

Loeb asked the question: When were viewing conditions optimal? He found that the best time to study cosmic perturbations was only 500 million years after the Big Bang.

This is also the era when the first stars and galaxies began to form. The timing is not coincidental. Because information about the early universe is lost when the first galaxies are made, the best time to view cosmic perturbations is right when stars began to form.

But it's not too late. Modern observers can still access this nascent era from a distance by using surveys designed to detect 21-centimeter radio emission from hydrogen gas at those early times. These radio waves take more than 13 billion years to reach us, so we can still see how the universe looked early on.

"21-centimeter surveys are our best hope," said Loeb. "By observing hydrogen at large distances, we can map how matter was distributed at the early times of interest."

The accelerating universe makes the picture bleak for future cosmologists. Because the expansion of the cosmos is accelerating, galaxies are being pushed beyond our horizon. Light that leaves those distant galaxies will never reach Earth in the far future. In addition, the scale of gravitationally unbound structures is growing larger and larger. Eventually, they, too, will stretch beyond our horizon. Some time between 10 and 100 times the universe's current age, cosmologists will no longer be able to observe them.

"If we want to learn about the very early universe, we'd better look now before it is too late!" Loeb said.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
WAYNE LUKEY said:
How can you say the best time would have been 13 billion years ago, if that was the case all your knowledge would be about the formation of stars, and not how they die, how they cluster together to form galaxies, or even that black holes exist. None of these would have happened 13 billion years ago, within the few generations that science has been studying the cosmos.

The best time to study the cosmos is now, when we can postulate, we can look out and find new and wondrous things in the cosmos and look back in time as well as the present and then theorise on how and why this amazing universe has come to be.

Yes I agree living in another few million or billion years would not be the best time, but right now is by far a better time than having been around 500 million after the so called big bang, when things were only just getting warmed up, and nothing really was happening on a cosmic scale, compared to today.
4 stars
CHRIS R BAKER from CALIFORNIA said:
So in the far distant future the early thought that our galaxie is the only one will become effectively true. Sad to think of it.
5 stars
BYRON GAIST said:
Very interesting article. Questions like "what caused the very first matter to emerge?" come to mind. It's good to have lots of cosmology articles in the magazine.
DENNIS BLANCHARD from CALIFORNIA said:
"First stars and galaxies began to form..." Hidden in this statement taken from the art caption is the time frame and processes that led to the first structure in the cosmos. How and when did dark matter shape ordinary matter (gas and stars) into gravitationally-bound groups in a hot expanding soup of cosmic raw materials?
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me