Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Astronomy story challenges perception that funding space science is a "luxury"

The article details how four significant modern-day technologies arose from the work of astronomers, physicists, and scientists.

Published: April 2, 2012
NA0512

In an era when baseball teams sell for $2 billion and consumers line up at Starbucks to purchase more than 8 million cups of premium-priced coffee every day, NASA struggles to secure adequate congressional funding. Currently, the space agency receives about half a penny from every tax dollar the federal government collects. For fiscal year 2013, this would amount to $17.7 billion, which is $59 million less than the agency received this year and the lowest amount since 1959 (as a percentage of the U.S. federal budget). Not only does this threaten the viability of existing programs, such as development of the James Webb Space Telescope — the successor to the aged Hubble Space Telescope — but also NASA’s long-term goal of launching its first test flight of a deep-space rocket and capsule in 2017, and the first crewed mission by 2021. This vehicle could eventually land a human on a distant asteroid or even Mars, helping the United States maintain its leadership role in exploring the cosmos.

But given the fiscal challenges closer to home, both the government and the public today question the value of funding space science. In response, Astronomy magazine commissioned C. Renée James, professor of astronomy at Sam Houston State University in Huntsville, Texas, to tackle this question: “What has astronomy done for you lately?” Her response appears in the May 2012 issue of Astronomy, on newsstands April 3.

In an article titled, appropriately, “What has astronomy done for you lately?” James details how four significant modern-day technologies trace their origins to the pioneering work of astronomers, physicists, and scientists in other disciplines. For example, her Astronomy magazine article explains how the search for the miniature black holes first theorized by Stephen Hawking in 1974 eventually led to the creation of the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) chip in the mid-1990s. This FFT chip underpinned the development of wireless Internet access in 1999, which is the basis for today’s $80-billion wireless industry and expedites countless transactions via WiFi every day.

Another technology that today’s consumers rely upon is the Global Positioning System (GPS), which owes its genesis to Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity, published in 1916. James’ article explains the connections that led from his theory to the GPS satellites that help millions of people worldwide easily find their destination and enhance the usefulness of a growing number of smartphone apps.

In addition, a modern cancer treatment and significant improvement in vision correction arose from scientific funding.

As astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, television personality and director of the American Museum of Natural History’s Hayden Planetarium in New York, stated March 7 during remarks he made to Congress about NASA’s proposed 2013 budget: “I say take it to a penny,” referring to the amount of every collected tax dollar the space agency receives, which would effectively double NASA’s budget.

Tyson added, “As goes the future of NASA, so too does the future of this nation.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
WENDELL AUKEMAN from MICHIGAN said:
I like the idea of space soap keeping space clean is worth a penny.
PAUL DEXTER from ILLINOIS said:
Maybe once it's proven that Lady Gaga is from outer space then the public would take interest.
5 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL said:
Sadly, politicians can never see beyond the next election, (especially in the US where elections are only 2 years apart for Representatives), so the short term always wins over the long-term. Most advances in science occur over decades, which politicians can almost never think about. Without an obvious perceived threat (such as the Space Race against the USSR), 'pork barrel' politics and parochial issues will always come out on top, I'm afraid. Most people do not think about the future at all, so the penny on their tax is more important than any scientific advance, however valuable it might be.,
4 stars
EWELL COLLINS from TEXAS said:
Don't forget Velcro, the world's most popular quick fastener/sealer!
WM F MAISANNES from FLORIDA said:
Let's not forget that, with the exception of a couple of doctors, legislators are mostly lawyers. And what do they know about science and engineering? Or space exploration value for that matter?
5 stars
RON CHINCHEN said:
The difficulty is that such articles are preaching to the converted.

Most people who read Astronomy Magazine are going to be very supportive of space technology. As long as main stream media concentrates on the sensational, the domestic and sports only (not that there's any problem about writing about those issues), science is going to take second place. This is especially the case with the increase in right wing fundamentalist religious beliefs seeking to challenge science.

To get the money needed to enhance science based projects including space technology, there is a need to think smart about how to make science attractive and useful to the average Joe Blow who probably at this stage wouldnt know the difference between Quantum Mechanics and Motor Mechanics.

Educate the ignorant masses (no disrespect intended) with something exciting in the general mass media and you'll get the cash to meet your space technology needs..and then some.
JOSEPH SHROCK from CALIFORNIA said:
Besides the development of new technologies, one should also consider the continuous upgrading, refining, and fine tuning of those already existing!
CARL ZURCHER from CALIFORNIA said:
Not to mention the microwave oven, gama ray sterilization, satellite technology, metallurgy - the lightest and strongest metals for our aircrafts and cars, communications, warfare technology, and the list goes on and on.....
5 stars
ROBERT M POWELL from WISCONSIN said:
And there's the insulin pump (from Mars Viking technology), EZVI (for source-area decontamination), firefighting technology, clean energy gasification technology (from Shuttle main engine engineering), and the list goes on and on...
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me