Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Amazon CEO's team recovers Apollo 11 engines from Atlantic Ocean

By Sarah Scoles Published: March 21, 2013
f1_apollo11
On board their ship, the Seabed Worker, Jeff Bezos’ team cleans a thrust chamber and fuel manifold that helped send Apollo 11 to the Moon in 1969. // Bezos Expeditions
What goes up must come down, and the five F-1 rocket engines that powered Apollo 11 into space are no exception. A few minutes after liftoff July 16, 1969, these engines fell into the Atlantic Ocean in a splashdown. NASA had no plans to recover them, but 42 years later, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and his exploration company, Jeff Bezos Expeditions, decided to do just that. A year later, Bezos announced that deep-sea sonar had located the Apollo 11 engines and that he planned to bring them to the surface.

A year after that, the Bezos Expeditions Apollo recovery project succeeded. On March 20, 2013, he stated on his website that the team had brought enough components back from the seafloor to create two full F-1 displays.

These engines, before they fulfilled their 165-second duty and crashed 67 miles (108 kilometers) back to Earth, boasted 1.5 million pounds of thrust and 32 million horsepower and in a single second burned 6,000 pounds of kerosene and liquid oxygen. They sent the first crew to the Moon and have been lying 2.6 miles (4.2km) underwater ever since.

After discovering the F-1s’ location, Bezos’ team spent three weeks at sea before recovering the engines. They sent Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) more than 14,000 feet (4,267 meters) under the ocean. Controlling and powering them from that distance required miles of fiber-optic cable and more than 4,000 volts, or more than 300 times the voltage necessary to power a car. 

The parallel challenges and technologies of the deep-sea exploration and space exploration were not lost on Bezos. 

“The technology used for the recovery is in its own way as otherworldly as the Apollo technology itself,” he said. “We on the team were often struck by poetic echoes of the lunar missions… The blackness of the horizon. The gray and colorless ocean floor.”

Although Bezos and the team themselves did not venture miles underwater, as the ROVs explored and interacted with the F-1s’ watery home, they relayed video of their journey.

“We’ve seen an underwater wonderland,” said Bezos. “An incredible sculpture garden of twisted F-1 engines that tells the story of a fiery and violent end, one that serves testament to the Apollo program.”

The engines, even after Bezos’ planned restoration, are still NASA property. The organization will determine where their ultimate resting places will be. However, they are likely to offer one to the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. Bezos hopes the second will go to the Museum of Flight in Seattle, near which both Amazon and Blue Origins, his private spaceflight company, are headquartered.

NASA is supportive of the recovery and restoration efforts. "This is a historic find, and I congratulate the team for its determination and perseverance in the recovery of these important artifacts of our first efforts to send humans beyond Earth orbit," said Charles Bolden, the agency administrator. 

Watch Bezos Expeditions' video of the Remotely Operated Vehicles, connected by fiber-optic cable to the team above the surface, recovering the F-1s from nearly 3 miles (5 kilometers) below the Atlantic Ocean.
Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
CHRIS BAKER said:
Like Kelly, I have to wonder why NASA, or anyone for that matter, figures these engines are NASA property any longer. They were abandoned on the ocean floor where they were the object of a salvage operation. Items recovered in salvage operations are normally the property of the person or people doing the salvage. "Our" government has peculiar ideas of property rights. These engines should belong to Jeff and his company, not to NASA.
5 stars
KEVIN STARNES from COLORADO said:
It's refreshing when people use their wealth for something meaningful, instead of building yet another vacation home they'll spend 3 months a year at. So many people have funded some great projects and while the list is long, here are a few examples: SETI was reinvigorated by Paul Allen of Microsoft, Steven Spielberg, Jodi Foster and David Packard of Hewlett Packard. SpaceX was founded by Elon Musk who made his fortune with PayPal. Director James Cameron used his submersible to let us see the seafloor of Challenger Deep (he's helped to fund many other projects too.) Author Clive Cussler funded the raising of the Hunley sub used in WWI. Richard Branson rekindled the spirit of adventure with his round-the-world balloon flights.

I'm certainly leaving out many others but you can see my point. My regards and thanks to the people that help keep science, archaeology, adventure and exploration alive and well.
4 stars
RON GLAZER from SOUTH AFRICA said:
I can still remember watching Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon. The Apollo program was probably the best example to show how man can achieve something extraordinary if we coordinate our energies to make it happen. Still a good example for any business to follow today. Sadly though, the technology of the Apollo engines will not get us to the stars and so we have to now focus on to the next leap in rocket propulsion to make this possible.
JACK HUMMEL II from NEW HAMPSHIRE said:
Glory days gone by... Now NASA's primary mission is to "reach out to the Muslim world"... How far we've come from, "failure is not an option"!
4 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL from UNITED KINGDOM said:
Wonderful that these magnificent machines will be on public view soon. But it only emphasises the tragedy that the marvellous lunar project was abandoned in its infancy for squalid political reasons, without even using all the existing rockets. America threw away a fifty-year lead in space exploration. Even now there are no serious plans to return to the Moon, and Mars gets farther away than ever!
5 stars
JACQUES POULIN said:
Excellent,good educational video.
5 stars
KELLY FRAVEL from COLORADO said:
Why are they NASA's property??

Obviously found on the ocean's floor.

OH sorry... of course there is now a law to enable government definition of everything as their property.
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
NASA recently awarded a contract to develop a similar, but smaller new kerosene & liquid oxygen burning engine that develops about half the thrust of the F-1 for possible use on the new Space Launch System. They could be used to power the boosters on the sides of the main rocket core. Research is also being done on the F-1 engines left over from the Apollo Program to better understand their performance. A significantly more powerful F-1 was built and tested, but never flown before the Apollo program was cancelled by Congress. The first stage of the Saturn V Moon Rocket, built at the Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans by 12,000 workers produced over 150,000,000 horsepower. It produced the loudest continuous noise ever made. The flame from the rocket was a nearly a quarter mile long. One test broke a window 6 miles away. When all the contracts are considered, nearly 500,000 Americans were involved in the Apollo program in some way. People who weren't around to witness the Moon landing program have no idea of the huge scale of it.
In a related development, Elon Musk just certified his upgraded Merlin 1D rocket engine that sets a new record for the highest thrust to weight ratio (150) of any liquid fueled rocket engine ever built, for use in his Falcon 9 rocket. Musk is tooling up his California SpaceX factory for mass production of the engines. His Falcon Heavy will soon be lifting about half as much weight into orbit as the Saturn V Moon Rocket did in 1969. The Space Launch System might surpass it, unless Congress cuts the funding.
If they do, Musk has his people working on something bigger.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me