Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

New study finds mysterious lack of dark matter in Sun’s neighborhood

The results may mean that attempts to directly detect particles of the invisible substance on Earth are likely to be unsuccessful.

By ESO, Garching, Germany Published: April 19, 2012
dark-matter-milky-way
This annotated artist’s impression shows the Milky Way Galaxy. The blue halo of material surrounding the galaxy indicates the expected distribution of the mysterious dark matter. New measurements based on the movements of stars show that the amount of dark matter in this region around the Sun is far smaller than predicted and have indicated that there is no significant dark matter at all in our neighborhood. The blue sphere centered on the Sun’s position shows the approximate size of the newly surveyed volume, but not its precise shape. Credit: ESO/L. Calçada
The most accurate study so far of the motions of stars in the Milky Way has found no evidence for dark matter in a large volume around the Sun. According to widely accepted theories, the solar neighborhood was expected to be filled with dark matter, a mysterious invisible substance that can only be detected indirectly by the gravitational force it exerts. But a new study by a team of astronomers in Chile has found that these theories just do not fit the observational facts. This may mean that attempts to directly detect dark matter particles on Earth are unlikely to be successful.

A team using the MPG/ESO 2.2-meter telescope at the European Southern Observatory’s (ESO) La Silla Observatory, along with other telescopes, has mapped the motions of more than 400 stars up to 13,000 light-years from the Sun. From this new data, they have calculated the mass of material in the vicinity of the Sun, in a volume four times larger than ever considered before.

“The amount of mass that we derive matches very well with what we see — stars, dust, and gas — in the region around the Sun,” said Christian Moni Bidin from the University of Concepcion in Chile. “But this leaves no room for the extra material — dark matter — that we were expecting. Our calculations show that it should have shown up very clearly in our measurements. But it was just not there!”

Dark matter is a mysterious substance that cannot be seen but instead shows itself by its gravitational attraction for the material around it. This extra ingredient in the cosmos was originally suggested to explain why the outer parts of galaxies, including the Milky Way, rotated so quickly, but dark matter now also forms an essential component of theories of how galaxies formed and evolved.

Today, it is widely accepted that this dark component constitutes about 80 percent of the mass in the universe, despite the fact that it has resisted all attempts to clarify its nature, which remains obscure. All attempts so far to detect dark matter in laboratories on Earth have failed.

By very carefully measuring the motions of many stars, particularly those away from the plane of the Milky Way, the team could work backward to deduce how much matter is present. The motions are a result of the mutual gravitational attraction of all the material, whether normal matter such as stars, or dark matter.

Astronomers’ existing models of how galaxies form and rotate suggest that the Milky Way is surrounded by a halo of dark matter. They are not able to precisely predict what shape this halo takes, but they do expect to find significant amounts in the region around the Sun. But only unlikely shapes for the dark matter halo — such as a highly elongated form — can explain the lack of dark matter uncovered in the new study.

The new results also mean that attempts to detect dark matter on Earth by trying to spot the rare interactions between dark matter particles and “normal” matter are unlikely to be successful.

“Despite the new results, the Milky Way certainly rotates much faster than the visible matter alone can account for,” said Moni Biden. “So, if dark matter is not present where we expected it, a new solution for the missing mass problem must be found. Our results contradict the currently accepted models. The mystery of dark matter has just become even more mysterious. Future surveys, such as the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission, will be crucial to move beyond this point.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
MIKE CAVEDON from MASSACHUSETTS said:
The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.
GUY GREENE from ARIZONA said:
The Universe is old, staggeringly old. Some part of the Dark Matter halo effect may actually be due to habitats of highly advanced civilizations, perhaps mostly non-biological. There may be huge numbers of such civilizations which over the past billions of years have consumed galactic material to construct enormous self-contained worlds. For the non-biological civilizations they would just be vast computers, maybe larger than our largest planets, using perhaps nuclear fusion power. For the biological civilizations perhaps a star would entirely encapsulated in a solid Dyson sphere roughly the size of our inner solar-system, with most of the inner surface available for habitat.

In either case the logical location to park such a civilization would be outside the relatively dangerous luminous areas of a galaxy. The luminous galactic volume would be analogous to some of our less-desirable urban areas, with the dark outer regions being analogous to suburbs. In the relatively densely-packed urban area there is danger from supernovas, magnetars, black holes, and possibly predatory space-faring civilizations springing up in various star systems.

For maximum security, these artificial structures would almost certainly be designed to have no detectable signature whatever, other than the inevitable gravitational effect resulting from vast numbers of them orbiting the galaxy.

I freely admit this theory is completely un-testable by a species such as ours, which still lives in (actually on) the galactic equivalent of a grass hut, but that doesn’t mean it’s wrong.
5 stars
MIKE CAVEDON from MASSACHUSETTS said:
The theory already exists and it is aether displacement.

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated aether wave passes through both.

The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.

Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.
FRED BJORKLUND from UTAH said:
I believe the answers to these questions likely resides in the sub-quantum and supra-universal realms, where knowledge, theory, and mathematics are, to my limited knowledge, practically non-existent. And, yes, I believe Planks limits on size and time are more a reflexion of the limits of our minds than reality. Dark matter can't be seen because it eludes all our available means to "see" it. Dark energy likely has a wavelength that to we humans is to small to detect. A new theory of everything is out there, someone just has to imagine it into existence.
5 stars
MIKE CAVEDON from MASSACHUSETTS said:
GR is correct. Aether has mass. Aether is physically displaced by matter. It is the aether which is displaced external to the matter which galaxies consist of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the galaxies which cause the speed at which galaxies rotate to be greater than can be accounted for by the mass of the matter which the galaxies consist of.
RALPH & LISA LAMBERT from CALIFORNIA said:
From what I can figure out, dark energy is much harder to find/understand than dark matter, i.e. just a fudge factor. And some people think I am strange to believe in a Higher Power (i.e. God) that I do not yet fully understand or explain. I see/feel effects that I attribute to this Higher Power. Others may use fudge factors that they can't detect and it is accepted. I think we all need to be a bit more open to perhaps unusual ideas.
5 stars
LOUIS BRASSARD said:
General Relativity(GR) + Estimation of Normal Matter (ENM) into galaxies is not compatible with rotational speed of galaxies. If we assume that GR and that ENM are both true then we need to assume that 80% of the galaxies masses is not included in ENM. This research shows that there is no black matter in our neighborhood. Maybe at the spatial scale of galaxy, GR is wrong.
JAMES LUMMEL said:
To JEFFREY M MADURA, thanks for the correction. You are right, is was "Luminiferous Aether" that I was talking about, I made a mistake by calling "Luminous Aether", I stand corrected.

Like "Dark Matter" today, "Luminiferous Aether" had many impossible properties in the attempt account for holes in the hypothesis and to also fit the limited framework of comprehension that was a drag on the science of the time (stated differently - to fit the fixed ideas that acted as brakes to scientific progress).

Science's greatest achievement has ALWAYS been when it realizes the differences between what it knows now and what is yet to be discovered. That was Einstein's greatest gift to the science of his time, a way out of the cul-de-sac science had gotten itself into.

We may have ended up in a cul-de-sac again and while it would be helpful, it shouldn't take the genius of another Einstein to lead the way out of this one.

Newton's Law of Gravity became a law because it was proven to be true beyond a shadow of a doubt, within the limits of the science used to verify it. But we found out later that Newton's Law of Gravity was incomplete and it took Relativity to fill in some of the holes. Relativity itself is in the process of being proven beyond of shadow of doubt, but again within the limits of current science to verify it.

That would strongly indicate that Relativity has some limitations as well. A natural result of those limitations is that there will be things that are simply beyond our ability to properly form a framework to be able to adequately question it.

As an example, how do you think a 19th century scientist would investigate time dilatation? What ever he came up with would be very entertaining, but also very wrong. Even if he managed somehow to touch on the truth, there existed no framework to understand the truth back then like we have now with Relativity.

"Dark Matter" is useful as a euphemism since is does label a perceived phenomenon that does need unraveling. What's wrong is putting all our eggs in one basket when history indicates the folly of doing just that, and then waiting for another Galileo, Newton or an Einstein to bail us out again.
5 stars
ROBERT A MORSTADT from UTAH said:
Dark matter does not enjoy the same level of validity as more established theories such as Newton's three laws of motion. An alternative to dark matter saying that the drop off in the force of gravity slightly different than the inverse square law has been in Scientific American in the past ten years.
3 stars
ROB BRONCKERS said:
From Eistein we know that space can be curved and that matter curves space. Why asume "dark matter" to be the cause of the observed curved space, why can space not be curved by itself and form regions with little and regions with large curverture. Why not assume that galaxies are where they are because of the fact that space was not flat at that point.
123
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me