Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Data from MESSENGER spacecraft reveals new insights on planet Mercury

Scientists have discovered that the core of the innermost planet is larger and more complex than expected and that Mercury’s formation wasn’t as orderly as some assumed.
By University of California, Santa Barbara Published: March 22, 2012
Mercury
Mercury, as taken from the spacecraft MESSENGER.
Thanks to the MErcury Surface, Space Environment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft, and a mission that took more than 10 years to complete, scientists now have a good picture of the solar system's innermost planet. On March 17, MESSENGER completed its one-year primary mission, orbiting Mercury, capturing nearly 100,000 images, and recording data that reveals new information about the planet's core, topography, and the mysterious radar-bright material in the permanently shadowed areas near the poles.

"Mercury is the last unexplored planet," said Stanton Peale from the University of California, Santa Barbara. The way Mercury was formed, he said, may show some constraints on the formation of the solar system.

For one thing, Mercury's core is larger than expected — almost 85 percent of the planetary radius. The Earth's core, in contrast, is just over half of the planet's radius. Additionally, Mercury appears to have a more complex core than Earth's — a solid iron sulfide layer that is now part of the mantle that encases a liquid core, which may float on a solid inner core.

The scientists also found that Mercury's solid outer core and liquid inner core contain more iron than Earth, relative to the whole planet, which influences the way Mercury's magnetic field was generated. However, Peale noted that the surface is comprised of lighter elements.

"We didn't expect so much sulfur," he said, adding that there was almost no iron found on the surface of the planet. With no iron, the volcanic surface rocks are too light to have come from a mantle with the large average density derived for the internal structure. This led to the concept of a two-layer mantle — a light upper silicate layer that could provide the low-density surface material over a dense iron sulfide layer.

In the larger picture, the presence of inordinately large amounts of sulfur on the surface indicates that Mercury's formation was not as orderly as some scientists had previously assumed, according to Peale. "Mercury is composed of material that had condensed over a wide range from the Sun," he said.

Other findings include a precise topographic model of the planet's northern hemisphere, which reveals a smaller spread in elevations compared to those of Mars or the Moon. Additionally, radar-bright features at the poles located in areas of permanent shadow have been found to be consistent with a water-ice hypothesis; however, the notion has yet to be tested further with MESSENGER's neutron spectrometer.

MESSENGER is already on the next phase of its investigations: an extended yearlong mission that includes more comprehensive and more targeted measurements.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
RONNIE MILLER from NORTH CAROLINA said:
It's articles like this that makes me feel sad that our Government wants to cut spending on space exploration
5 stars
RON CHINCHEN said:
I suspect that given Mercury's liquid core like Earths, that many Earth sized planets within close proximity to their respective stars, such as in the 'goldilocks' torus, are likely to have strong magnetic fields for billions of years given that iron and nickel are very common elements in the Universe and seem to be the basis of the core of many planets. The caveat of course is spin, as noted when comparing Venus to Earth. If such magnetic fields are long lasting on such planets, then surface life on such planets has one of the principal necessities for survival. Otherwise only aquatic or sub terranian life could exist
5 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL said:
It would be interesting to have more detail as to how these fascinating conclusions about Mercury's complex core have been arrived at, presumably by gravitational studies.
4 stars
GERARDO W FISCHER said:
Your report is short, there is much more information that could be exposed in detail. But the news again confirms the rule that nature disposes of more variations of what we at first glance believe uniform. It was so with the 4 big moons of Jupiter - not at all copies of our Moon, and so it went on. I wouldn't be astonished if in 2015 Pluto shows more differences to Neptun's big satellite Triton than expected these days.
5 stars
AARON JEDLICKI from ALASKA said:
Amazing, cant wait to hear more about the messenger missions!
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me