Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Dark matter core defies explanation in NASA Hubble image

New results from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope confirm that dark matter and galaxies separated in Abell 520 instead of staying anchored together, as predicted.
By NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. Published: March 2, 2012
Abell 520
This composite image shows the distribution of dark matter, galaxies, and hot gas in the core of the merging galaxy cluster Abell 520, formed from a violent collision of massive galaxy clusters. Credit: NASA/ESA/CFHT/CXO, M.J. Jee (Univ. of California, Davis)/A. Mahdavi (San Francisco State Univ.)
Astronomers using data from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope have observed what appears to be a clump of dark matter left behind from a wreck between massive clusters of galaxies. The result could challenge current theories about dark matter that predict galaxies should be anchored to the invisible substance even during the shock of a collision.

Abell 520 is a gigantic merger of galaxy clusters located 2.4 billion light-years away. Dark matter is not visible, although its presence and distribution is found indirectly through its effects. Dark matter can act like a magnifying glass, bending and distorting light from galaxies and clusters behind it. Astronomers can use this effect, called gravitational lensing, to infer the presence of dark matter in massive galaxy clusters.

This technique revealed that dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee from the University of California, Davis. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter."

Initial detections of dark matter in the cluster, made in 2007, were so unusual that astronomers shrugged them off as unreal because of poor data. New results from Hubble confirm that dark matter and galaxies separated in Abell 520.

One way to study the overall properties of dark matter is by analyzing collisions between galaxy clusters, the largest structures in the universe. When galaxy clusters crash, astronomers expect galaxies to tag along with the dark matter, like a dog on a leash. Clouds of hot, X-ray-emitting intergalactic gas, however, plow into one another, slow down, and lag behind the impact.

That theory was supported by visible-light and X-ray observations of a colossal collision between two galaxy clusters called the Bullet Cluster. The galactic grouping has become an example of how dark matter should behave.

Studies of Abell 520 show that dark matter's behavior may not be so simple. Using the original observations, astronomers found the system's core was rich in dark matter and hot gas, but contained no luminous galaxies, which normally would be seen in the same location as the dark matter. NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory was used to detect the hot gas. Astronomers used the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope and Subaru Telescope atop Mauna Kea in Hawaii to infer the location of dark matter by measuring the gravitationally lensed light from more distant background galaxies.

The astronomers then turned to Hubble's Wide Field Planetary Camera 2, which can detect subtle distortions in the images of background galaxies and use this information to map dark matter. To astronomers' surprise, the Hubble observations helped confirm the 2007 findings.

"We know of maybe six examples of high-speed galaxy cluster collisions where the dark matter has been mapped," Jee said. "But the Bullet Cluster and Abell 520 are the two that show the clearest evidence of recent mergers, and they are inconsistent with each other. No single theory explains the different behavior of dark matter in those two collisions. We need more examples."

The team proposed numerous explanations for the findings, but each is unsettling for astronomers. In one scenario, which would have staggering implications, some dark matter may be what astronomers call "sticky." Like two snowballs smashing together, normal matter slams together during a collision and slows down. However, dark matter blobs are thought to pass through each other during an encounter without slowing down. This scenario proposes that some dark matter interacts with itself and stays behind during an encounter.

Another possible explanation for the discrepancy is that Abell 520 has resulted from a more complicated interaction than the Bullet Cluster encounter. Abell 520 may have formed from a collision between three galaxy clusters, instead of just two colliding systems in the case of the Bullet Cluster.

A third possibility is that the core contained many galaxies, but they were too dim to be seen, even by Hubble. Those galaxies would have to have formed dramatically fewer stars than other normal galaxies. Armed with the Hubble data, the group will try to create a computer simulation to reconstruct the collision and see if it yields some answers to dark matter's weird behavior.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
MIKE CAVEDON from MASSACHUSETTS said:
What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

The ripple is a gravitational wave.
3 stars
MS ROSEMARY CIPOLETTA from MASSACHUSETTS said:
It seems to me, an amateur astronomer, that we spend much wasted intelligence and technology on theoretical aspects of astronomy. I have read several publications on Dark Matter/Energy, and it seems senseless to even consider the matter. Why are we not spending intellectual, technological, and financial assets on the study and practical applications of our own solar system. To spend $13-16 billion on a collider to prove the Higgs-Boson particle is ridiculous. We could have sent 15-20 missions to other planets/moons for the same cost, and for much more practical gain. If we prove that Dark Matter/Energy, Higgs-Boson, and Black Holes exist, then what? We must learn of our own shores before sailing the Seas of Uncertainty.
5 stars
MIKE CAVEDON from MASSACHUSETTS said:
'Voyager hits new region at solar system edge'
http://www.astronomy.com/News-Observing/News/2011/12/Voyager%20hits%20new%20region%20at%20solar%20system%20edge.aspx

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

Aether displaced by the solar system is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

This is gravity.
5 stars
MIKE CAVEDON from MASSACHUSETTS said:
The only thing the Michelson-Morley experiment disproved was an immobile aether the Earth moved through.

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid.

What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle has a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated aether wave passes through both.
KANG KIM from CALIFORNIA said:
As Adam Jones said aether was completely disproved by scientific experiments before 1900 and this was the basis for Einstein's postulates for Special Theory of Relativity. Does anyone know of scientific evidence (experimental or theoretical) for the existence of aether? If we are talking about a different kind of aether, can anyone give a precise definition of "new" aether?
5 stars
MIKE CAVEDON from MASSACHUSETTS said:
JOHN C KREMER, That's not exactly what I said. I said the Higgs boson is condensed aether. What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Dark matter does not travel with matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. The Universe is, or our local Universe is in, a jet; analogous to the polar jet of a black hole. Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet. The analogy are objects floating down a river. At the mouth of the river all of the objects move away from one another. This is analogous to dark energy. Even as the objects move away from one another the water pushes back and exerts pressure toward each individual object. This is analogous to gravity. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. Aether emitted into the Universal jet is dark energy.
MIKE CAVEDON from MASSACHUSETTS said:
'Abell 383: An Elusive Subject'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/multimedia/abell383.html

"If the relative lack of dark matter in the center of Abell 383 is confirmed, it may show that improvements need to be made in our understanding of how normal matter behaves in the center of galaxy clusters, or it may show that dark matter particles can interact with each other, contrary to the prevailing model."

It shows the galaxy clusters are moving through the aether. It shows what is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. Aether has mass.
5 stars
JOHN C KREMER from COLORADO said:
We've seen that dark matter apparently has a mass effect by the way the lensing of light from distant galaxies is bent around closer galaxies to form a lens enlargement of the more distant galaxies. We assume that this dark matter represents about 23% of the mass of the universe, and that another entity, called dark energy, represents about 72% of the other part of the universes mass. If these dark entities are one and the same dark stuff, as I suspect, then that 95% will yank and pull the remaining 5% baryonic matter all over the universe. Maybe, as Mike Cavedon and Lorne Bell suggest, Dark Matter is the extremely small and extremely proliferous particle called the Higgs boson, and thus creates the increasing expansion of the baryonic universe.
MIKE CAVEDON from MASSACHUSETTS said:
Dismissing the ether is why physics is so screwed up it is trying to figure out why 'dark matter' is left behind after galaxy clusters collide. Dark matter does not travel with matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. Dark matter is not left behind after galaxy clusters collide. Aether was there all the time.

All the Michelson-Morley experiment disproved was a stationary ether the Earth moved through.

"According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable" - Albert Einstein

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the ether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the ether.
ADAM JONES from SOUTH CAROLINA said:
Actually Mike Cavedon from Massachusetts, scientist tossed the idea of an interstellar "ether" back in the early 1900's. Einstein said that the "whole idea of an ether was unnecessary, providing one was willing to abandon the idea of absolute time."(Hawking, A Brief History of Time, 30) A few weeks after Einstein, french mathematician Henri Poincare came near to the same conclusion. The "ether" was disproved in 1887 when Albert Michelson and Edward Morley conducted an experiment on it at the Case School of Applied Science in Cleveland.
123
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me