Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

A planetary system from the early universe

Astronomers have discovered two planets that orbit an extremely metal-poor star with an estimated age of 12.8 billion years.

By Max Planck Institute, Garching, Germany Published: March 28, 2012
HIP-11952
This artist's depiction shows HIP 11952 and it's two Jupiter-like planets. The planetary system is unusal because the parent star is extremely old and metal-poor. Illustration by Timotheos Samartzidis
A group of European astronomers has discovered an ancient planetary system that is likely to be a survivor from one of the earliest cosmic eras, 13 billion years ago. The system consists of the star HIP 11952 and two planets, which have orbital periods of 290 and 7 days. Whereas planets usually form within clouds that include heavier chemical elements, the star HIP 11952 contains very little other than hydrogen and helium. The system promises to shed light on planet formation in the early universe — under conditions quite different from those of later planetary systems such as our own.
 
It is widely accepted that planets form in disks of gas and dust that swirl around young stars. But look into the details, and many open questions remain — including the question of what it actually takes to make a planet. With a sample of more than 750 confirmed planets orbiting stars other than the Sun, astronomers have some idea of the diversity among planetary systems. But certain trends also have emerged: Statistically, a star that contains more “metals” — chemical elements other than hydrogen and helium — is more likely to have planets.
 
This suggests a key question. Originally, the universe contained almost no chemical elements other than hydrogen and helium. Almost all heavier elements have been produced over time inside stars and then have been flung into space as massive stars end their lives in giant explosions (supernovae). So what about planet formation under conditions like those of the very early universe? If metal-rich stars are more likely to form planets, are there, conversely, stars with a metal content so low that they cannot form planets at all? And if the answer is yes, then when throughout cosmic history should astronomers expect the very first planets to form?
 
Now a group of astronomers, including researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Heidelberg, Germany, has discovered a planetary system that could help provide answers to those questions. As part of a survey targeting especially metal-poor stars, they identified two giant planets around a star known as HIP 11952, which lies in the constellation Cetus at a distance of about 375 light-years from Earth. By themselves, these planets, HIP 11952b and HIP 11952c, are not unusual. What is unusual is the fact that they orbit such an extremely metal-poor and, in particular, very old star.
 
For classical models of planet formation, which favor metal-rich stars when it comes to forming planets, planets around such a star should be extremely rare. Veronica Roccatagliata of the University Observatory Munich in Germany, the principal investigator of the survey, explained, “In 2010, we found the first example of such a metal-poor system, HIP 13044. Back then, we thought it might be a unique case; now, it seems as if there might be more planets around metal-poor stars than expected.”
 
HIP 13044 became famous as the “exoplanet from another galaxy” — the star is very likely part of a so-called stellar stream, the remnant of another galaxy swallowed by our own billions of years ago.
 
Compared to other exoplanetary systems, HIP 11952 is not only one that is extremely metal-poor, but, at an estimated age of 12.8 billion years, also one of the oldest systems known so far. “This is an archaeological find in our own backyard,” added Johny Setiawan of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, who led the study of HIP 11952. “These planets probably formed when our galaxy itself was still a baby.”
 
“We would like to discover and study more planetary systems of this kind," said Anna Pasquali from the Center for Astronomy at Heidelberg University in Germany, a co-author of the study. "That would allow us to refine our theories of planet formation. The discovery of the planets of HIP 11952 shows that planets have been forming throughout the life of our universe."
Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
LARS LINDSTROM from PENNSYLVANIA said:
This opens a new perspective: If planetary systems have been around since the dawn of creation, maybe there are more planets in the observable universe than stars? And, since early planetary systems seem to be more or less chaotic, maybe there are as many "orphan planets" as there are stars? Just imagine...
4 stars
CRISTINE MINCHEFF from CALIFORNIA said:
Since this star is actually from another galaxy isn't it also possible it interacted with and captured interstellar gas from the merger with the Milky Way and planets formed around this star long after it had been ignited? The gas could have contained enough metal to initiate planet formation, but not enough mass to affect the star. Additionally is it a single star system or a member of a multiple system?
5 stars
CLIFFORD J DAVIS from KENTUCKY said:
Non metals, being less dense would take considerably longer to condense into planets. Jupiter has a rocky core which accelerated its formation. The planets in the article may have no, or very little, rocky core cus the higher elements were not available. Because it would take so much longer to create a 'lighter' gas planet it is more likely the free gas in the protoplanetary disk would be dissipated by solar wind. Making it less likely for the planet to be large. I'm wondering if any simulations of this have been done.
4 stars
KELLY FRAVEL from COLORADO said:
If ... this is... a star that has been thrown out of its original Galaxy... almost as old as the putative age of the Universe... then is it not possible that some systems... perhaps rare... are made up of both an orphan planet or planets... and a low metal orphan... re-captured star?

For instance... what is the current thinking on whether only one planet at a time is thrown out of its system as opposed to, two or more planets being hurled in a climatic gravitational event... and... then stay on a close trajectory/proximity etc. ?

Secondly... in between "now" and give or take 13 billion years ago, is a LOT... of potential encounters and perturbations.

Is it possible... that a migrating star... encounters/creates in that long period... gravitational vortices within... dense clouds of material... that might also on rare occasions... form a kind of... post proto-system planetary disc dynamic?

What is the idea behind that higher metal stars produce more planets anyway? Is it something in high metal vortices... the clumpiness of that kind of cloud?
3 stars
GERARDO W FISCHER said:
Thinking of our Jupiter - couldn't both planets of that old star be made completely of hydrogen? Certainly you have the answer there, as you know the masses.

4 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
Planets are such a tiny fraction of the mass of a normal star, that it isn't too surprising to find some around all but the very first stars that formed. And a lot of the very first stars probably were so large, that they blew up quite soon after they formed, thus making enough heavy elements to form millions of early planets. I guess?
They say that there are more stars in the Universe than grains of sand on all the beaches on Earth. Think how many planets there are. I wonder how many dinosaurs are walking around out there? And aliens wasting time on laptops, wondering if they are alone? Probably a very large number of both. If some have gotten the time warp thing down, they might already have the answer. Any life forms that advanced, would probably spend their time on things like compiling a galactic dinosaur census. It's not like they would have to go to work. Or would they? How would such an advanced civilization be organized? I'm just grateful for spell check.
JASON BEAMAN said:
There should be no reason why Gas Giants couldn't have formed during the time of low metal content. Rocky planets on the other hand would be very rare if it would even be possible. I would think that since the metal content is so low that it would require a much larger gas cloud in order to form a rocky planet, which would increase the likely hood of it being in a multiple star system.
5 stars
SHANE MCNAMARA from WASHINGTON said:
This is very cool and I am interested to see what causes a unique system such as this.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me