Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Researchers say galaxy may swarm with nomad planets

This possible new class of celestial objects will affect current theories of planet formation and could change our understanding of the origin and abundance of life.
By Stanford University, Palo Alto, California Published: February 24, 2012
nomad planet
This image is an artistic rendition of a nomad object wandering the interstellar medium. The object is intentionally blurry to represent uncertainty about whether it has an atmosphere. A nomadic object may be an icy body akin to an object found in the outer solar system, a more rocky material akin to asteroids, or even a gas giant similar in composition to the most massive solar system planets and exoplanets. Credit: Greg Stewart/SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Our galaxy may be awash in homeless planets, wandering through space instead of orbiting a star.

In fact, there may be 100,000 times more nomad planets in the Milky Way than stars, according to a new study by researchers at the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (KIPAC) in Stanford, California.

If observations confirm the estimate, this new class of celestial objects will affect current theories of planet formation and could change our understanding of the origin and abundance of life.

“If any of these nomad planets are big enough to have a thick atmosphere, they could have trapped enough heat for bacterial life to exist,” said Louis Strigari from KIPAC. Although nomad planets don’t bask in the warmth of a star, they may generate heat through internal radioactive decay and tectonic activity.

Searches over the past two decades have identified more than 500 planets outside our solar system, almost all of which orbit stars. Last year, researchers detected about a dozen nomad planets, using a technique called gravitational microlensing, which looks for stars whose light is momentarily refocused by the gravity of passing planets.

The research produced evidence that roughly two nomads exist for every typical, main sequence star in our galaxy. The new study estimates that nomads may be up to 50,000 times more common than that.

To arrive at what Strigari called “an astronomical number,” the KIPAC team took into account the known gravitational pull of the Milky Way Galaxy, the amount of matter available to make such objects, and how that matter might divvy itself up into objects ranging from the size of Pluto to larger than Jupiter. Not an easy task, considering no one is quite sure how these bodies form. According to Strigari, some were probably ejected from solar systems, but research indicates that not all of them could have formed in that fashion.

“To paraphrase Dorothy from The Wizard of Oz, if correct, this extrapolation implies that we are not in Kansas anymore, and in fact we never were in Kansas,” said Alan Boss from the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C. “The universe is riddled with unseen planetary-mass objects that we are just now able to detect.”

A good count, especially of the smaller objects, will have to wait for the next generation of big survey telescopes, especially the space-based Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope and the ground-based Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, both set to begin operation in the early 2020s.

A confirmation of the estimate could lend credence to another possibility mentioned in the paper — that as nomad planets roam their starry pastures, collisions could scatter their microbial flocks to seed life elsewhere.

“Few areas of science have excited as much popular and professional interest in recent times as the prevalence of life in the universe,” said Roger Blandford from KIPAC. “What is wonderful is that we can now start to address this question quantitatively by seeking more of these erstwhile planets and asteroids wandering through interstellar space, and then speculate about hitchhiking bugs.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
CHRIS R BAKER from CALIFORNIA said:
Logically there would be more "planets" than stars. There are a few giant stars, there are many mid sized stars, there are lots and lots of small dim stars. Why wouldn't that progression continue?
4 stars
WAYNE LUKEY said:
Richard I think you have it, with so much matter tied up in rogue planets there would be no need for hypothetical nonsense like dark matter.

With all the super massive planets surrounding all the stars, plus “an astronomical number” of nomad planets, then include all the star forming gas that has yet to be accreted into stars and the "ghost" stars that were reported earlier, the ones that have died without an explosion, the amount of mass that is available in the universe that has not been included in the astronomers calculations would certainly have a major effect on the outcome and override the necessity for dark matter.
4 stars
HERNAN QUEVEDO said:
An over-interesting study. More of this, please.
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
Zillions of planets, sure. Life away from stars, doubtful. It is COLD out there. Take a walk outside at 4 A.M. on New Years Day. And that is only after 12 hours without solar power. Imagine interstellar space trillions of miles from the nearest star. Now that would be REALLY cold. Chemical reactions would nearly stop at such a low temperature. There is life out there, but it is probably hanging out near nice warm stars. There are a lot of them.
3 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL said:
We need more detail of the research that leads to these extraordinary conclusions: "50,000 times more common than that" is not a trivial difference!
Is there another solution to the 'Dark Matter' problem here?
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me