Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

American planetary exploration is in grave danger, say scientists

According to the American Astronomy Society's Division for Planetary Sciences, the proposed cuts in NASA's 2013 budget will force the United States to give up its leadership in solar system exploration.

By AAS Division for Planetary Science Published: February 21, 2012
ExoMars-2016
Under the prosed 2013 NASA budget, the agency would no longer be able to collaborate with the European Space Agency on the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO), shown here, scheduled to arrive at Mars in 2016.
Photo by ESA-AOES Medialab

The Obama administration's proposed 2013 NASA budget focuses almost all the agency's cuts onto the planetary science program that funds the robotic exploration of the solar system. The Planetary Science Division budget would be cut by 20 percent from $1.5 billion in 2012 to $1.2 billion in 2013. The proposed budget cuts will force the United States to give up its leadership in solar system exploration.

The robotic exploration program has delivered a golden age of planetary exploration including the Mars rovers; the Cassini mission to Saturn; MESSENGER, which is now orbiting Mercury; Dawn, orbiting the asteroid Vesta; and the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and GRAIL, which are orbiting our Moon to explore its structure and origins.

"If the NASA budget is passed in its current form, American leadership in planetary sciences will be endangered," said Dan Britt, chair of Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society (AAS). "We strongly believe that the robotic exploration of the solar system resonates with the American people, that it is something that NASA needs to be doing, and it is something the American people will support even in tight budget times."

Under the proposed budget, NASA will be forced to cancel its plans for its most ambitious exploration missions, slash the Mars Exploration Program, and kill the Lunar Quest Program. The cuts will also end collaborations with the European Space Agency on the 2016 Mars Trace Gas Orbiter and the 2018 ExoMars rover, delay the economical Discovery and New Frontiers space programs, and force cuts in operations and data analysis for a number of current missions.

The planetary science community recently finished its latest decadal survey, Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science, under the auspices of the National Research Council. It recommends to NASA a program of balanced exploration and scientific analysis. Under the president's proposal, implementation of the balanced, consensus, budget-conservative plan outlined in the decadal survey will not be possible.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
CHRIS R BAKER from CALIFORNIA said:
When Obama took office, a gallon of Gas averaged $1.78 a gallon. Now look at it. He has no interest in space. No interest in doing things that benefit us. No interest other than taking from people and giving it to his cronies. You can bet if one of his cronies ran a space oriented company, then NASA would be funding them and NASA's budget wouldn't be cut.
THOMAS LUICH from WASHINGTON said:
A disappointing bit of news. But when big projects like the JWST are 3-4x over budget, and way behind schedule, who would want to keep writing checks to NASA. Sadly, NASA's lack of credibility hurts us all.
1 star
CARL BLOMQUIST SR from FLORIDA said:

Obama should mind his own business and let
Nasa Explore the universe as much as they want.
It's for this countries own good and keep our lead
in exploring the universe. It's about time we put this
country first and don't worry about what others do.

5 stars
ROBERT MCCABE from NORTH CAROLINA said:
"If the NASA budget is passed in its current form, American leadership in planetary sciences will be endangered," said Dan Britt, chair of Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society (AAS).

Of course it will. Our president does not believe in America being a leader in anything.
4 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
The scientists would be upset, as would I, if that were my profession. They may not have noticed that the US National debt is now about $15,000,000,000,000. That is kind of a lot of money, especially when you remember that the GDP is about $14,000,000,000,000. We are adding about a trillion a year to the debt. The economy isn't growing NEARLY that fast. The unfunded present value of the obligations of the Federal government (that would be YOU) for the next 50 years, is estimated to be at least $50 TRILLION, unless legislative changes occur. So, unless we cause VERY high inflation to reduce the value of the debt, budgets must be cut and taxes increased, or we will find ourselves in the same boat with Greece in about 8 years. Growth would increase tax revenues, but high growth is very difficult to achieve with such a high level of government and private debt.
The GDP of the entire European Union is larger than that of the USA. It is roughly $16 trillion. China is at about $6 trillion. We need to cooperate with Europe on planetary exploration. But for the USA, manned space exploration is far more important. Two things fascinate most children, dinosaurs, and people in space. Norm Augustine, one of the smartest men in the USA, said that on the NASA committee charged with studying the future course for NASA. If we are to maintain our standard of living by being able to compete with China and Europe, we must develop as much advanced technology as we can. The best way to do that is to interest young people with extraordinary intelligence, in science and engineering, not finance, law, or sociology. Such professions are necessary and important, but they don't create vast new wealth for society as a whole. Invention of new technology does. Knowing what type of gas is on Neptune is of far less use to society than knowing how to make a better battery, or computer. That is why we need to direct most, but certainly not all, of our limited funds for space exploration to astronauts, rather than robots to Titan.
Sorry scientists, we're going broke. We can't keep borrowing more and more money forever. The word is 'unsustainable'. I would love to see a rover running around on every moon out there, but we can't afford it. Better to cut a little, than to look uncooperative, and get cut a LOT. Congress could eliminate NASA funding completely, and only a few would not get reelected for doing so. A lot of ignorant people would probably view it as a good thing! Millions of Americans think all space spending is a waste of money. They think it is a huge portion of the Federal budget, along with the 'earmarks'. Their vote counts the same as the scientists'.
5 stars
DAVID IACONO from MARYLAND said:
Planetary exploration is critical to a new generation of American scientists. I rememer John Glenn's mission in Friendship 7 50 years ago and how the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo programs inspired a whole generation of scientists. By not funding these programs, we as a nation are doomed to mediocrity.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me