Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

The Milky Way contains at least 100 billion planets according to survey

Results indicate that, statistically, every star in the galaxy should have at least one planet, if not more.
By STScl, Baltimore, Maryland Published: January 17, 2012
Planets everywhere
This artist's illustration gives an impression of how common planets are around the stars in the Milky Way. The planets, their orbits, and their host stars are all vastly magnified compared to their real separations. A six-year search that surveyed millions of stars using the microlensing technique concluded that planets around stars are the rule rather than the exception. The average number of planets per star is greater than one. Credit: NASA/ESA/M. Kornmesser (ESO)
Our Milky Way Galaxy contains a minimum of 100 billion planets according to a detailed statistical study based on the detection of three extrasolar planets by an observational technique called microlensing.

Kailash Sahu from the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, is part of an international team reporting that our galaxy contains a minimum of one planet for every star on average. This means that there is likely to be a minimum of 1,500 planets within just 50 light-years of Earth.

The results are based on observations taken over six years by the Probing Lensing Anomalies NETwork (PLANET) collaboration, which Sahu co-founded in 1995. The study concludes that there are far more Earth-sized planets than bloated Jupiter-sized worlds. This is based on calibrating a planetary mass function that shows the number of planets increases for lower-mass worlds. A rough estimate from this survey would point to the existence of more than 10 billion terrestrial planets across our galaxy.

The team's conclusions are gleaned from a planet search technique called microlensing. The technique takes advantage of the random motions of stars, which are generally too small to be noticed. If one star passes precisely in front of another star, the gravity of the foreground star bends the light from the background star.

This means that the foreground star acts like a giant lens amplifying the light from the background star. A planetary companion around the foreground star can produce additional brightening of the background star. This additional brightening reveals the planet, which is otherwise too faint to be seen by telescopes.

The higher the mass of the "lensing" star, the longer is the duration of the microlensing event. Typical microlensing events due to a star last about a month, but the extra brightening due to a planet typically lasts a few hours to a couple of days.

Using the microlensing technique, astronomers can determine a planet's mass. This method, however, does not reveal any clues about the world's composition.

Unlike other prominent planet-detection techniques, which measure the shadows of planets passing in front of their stars (transit) or measure the wobble of a star due to the gravitational tug of a planet (radial velocity and astrometry), the gravitational-lensing technique is unbiased in the selection of the host star.

The other techniques work best for finding planets close to their stars with short orbital periods. But microlensing can detect a planet that is as far from its star as Saturn is from our Sun, or as close as Mercury is to our Sun. The technique is also sensitive to detecting planets as small as Mercury.

Wide-field survey campaigns such as Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) and Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA) cover millions of stars every clear night in order to identify and alert stellar microlensing events as early as possible. Follow-up collaborations, such as PLANET, monitor selected candidates more frequently — 24 hours a day — using a round-the-world network of telescopes.

Of the approximately 40 microlensing events closely monitored, three showed evidence for exoplanets. Using a statistical analysis, the team found that one in six stars hosts a Jupiter-mass planet. What's more, half of the stars have Neptune-mass planets, and two-thirds of the stars have Earth-mass planets. Therefore, low-mass planets are more abundant than their massive counterparts.

"This means, statistically, every star in the galaxy should have at least one planet, and probably more," said Sahu.

"Results from the three main techniques of planet detection are rapidly converging to a common result: Not only are planets common in the galaxy, but there are more small planets than large ones," said Stephen Kane from NASA's Exoplanet Science Institute at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. "This is encouraging news for investigations into habitable planets."

These results are independent from a gravitational-lens survey led by Takahiro Sumi of Osaka University in Japan, which estimates there are hundreds of billions of planets with orbits larger than Saturn's orbit, or are free-floating throughout the galaxy.
Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
WINN GILLETTE from CALIFORNIA said:
Exciting or not, it is now becoming quite apparent that planetary formation is a natural by-product of normal star formation. In fact, several planets are usually formed during these early star stages.
Modern stellar observations continue to prove this fact out in increasing numbers. Our own Solar System being the closest and most obvious case of this.
The real exciting part is how many of the billions of planets that are out there contain some sort of intelligent life. Again, using our Solar System as a guide post, maybe one in eight (or nine)?

Can you say "Federation of Planets"? I knew you could.
3 stars
RICHARD FLEURY from NEW YORK said:
I like what is see. I am 75 yrs OLD would like to print what i read
cant remember what i had for breakfast. Guess I have keep reading.
5 stars
JOHN GOETHE from SOUTH CAROLINA said:
Can we earthlings produce a radio frequency powerful enough to travel 50 light years and be received? Many mega-watts huh. It's strange we haven't received any signals from space with this many planets out there.
3 stars
MYRON C CHAPLIN from VIRGINIA said:
Although exciting, I find the results of this report suspect. I have been taught that you need a relatively large sample set in order to conduct a reasonably accurate statistical analysis. I believe that most statisticians would consider a sample set of three out of a population of billions to be woefully inadequate. Because of that, I think that we should all wait for corroboration from the other surveys, especially from Kepler and its hundreds of thousands of stars, before we get too excited about this kind of news.
5 stars
BRIAN CANTLE said:
I've always believed there to be untold numbers of planets out there, but it's still very cool to see the artist's picture bring it to life!
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me