Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

NASA telescopes help find rare galaxy at dawn of time

The galaxy GN-108036 is 12.9 billion light-years away and is producing stars at a high rate.
By Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California Published: December 27, 2011
Galaxy GN-108036
This image shows one of the most distant galaxies known, called GN-108036, dating back to 750 million years after the Big Bang that created our universe. The galaxy's light took 12.9 billion years to reach us. NASA/JPL-Caltech/STScI/University of Tokyo
Astronomers using NASA’s Spitzer and Hubble space telescopes have discovered that one of the most distant galaxies known is churning out stars at a shockingly high rate. The blob-shaped galaxy, called GN-108036, is the brightest galaxy found to date at such great distances.

The galaxy, which was discovered and confirmed using ground-based telescopes, is 12.9 billion light-years away. Data from Spitzer and Hubble were used to measure the galaxy’s high star production rate, equivalent to about 100 Suns per year. For reference, our Milky Way Galaxy is about five times larger and 100 times more massive than GN-108036, but makes roughly 30 times fewer stars per year.

“The discovery is surprising because previous surveys had not found galaxies this bright so early in the history of the universe,” said Mark Dickinson from the National Optical Astronomy Observatory in Tucson, Arizona. “Perhaps those surveys were just too small to find galaxies like GN-108036. It may be a special, rare object that we just happened to catch during an extreme burst of star formation.”

The international team of astronomers, led by Masami Ouchi from the University of Tokyo, Japan, first identified the remote galaxy after scanning a large patch of sky with the Subaru Telescope atop Mauna Kea in Hawaii. Its great distance was then carefully confirmed with the W.M. Keck Observatory, also on Mauna Kea.

“We checked our results on three different occasions over two years, and each time confirmed the previous measurement,” said Yoshiaki Ono from the University of Tokyo.

GN-108036 lies near the beginning of time itself, a mere 750 million years after our universe was created 13.7 billion years ago in the “Big Bang.” Its light has taken 12.9 billion years to reach us, so we are seeing it as it existed in the distant past.

Astronomers refer to the object’s distance by a number called its “redshift,” which relates to how much of its light has stretched to longer, redder wavelengths due to the expansion of the universe. Objects with larger redshifts are farther away and are seen further back in time. GN-108036 has a redshift of 7.2. Only a handful of galaxies have confirmed redshifts greater than 7, and only two of these have been reported to be more distant than GN-108036.

Infrared observations from Spitzer and Hubble were crucial for measuring the galaxy’s star-formation activity. Astronomers were surprised to see such a large burst of star formation because the galaxy is so small and from such an early cosmic era. Back when galaxies were first forming in the first few hundreds of millions of years after the Big Bang, they were much smaller than they are today, having yet to bulk up in mass.

During this epoch, as the universe expanded and cooled after its explosive start, hydrogen atoms permeating the cosmos formed a thick fog that was opaque to ultraviolet light. This period, before the first stars and galaxies had formed and illuminated the universe, is referred to as the Dark Ages. The era came to an end when light from the earliest galaxies burned through, or “ionized,” the opaque gas, causing it to become transparent. Galaxies similar to GN-108036 may have played an important role in this event.

“The high rate of star formation found for GN-108036 implies that it was rapidly building up its mass some 750 million years after the Big Bang when the universe was only about five percent of its present age,” said Bahram Mobasher from the University of California, Riverside. “This was, therefore, a likely ancestor of massive and evolved galaxies seen today.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
ELLEN STEENS from CALIFORNIA said:
"Astronomers refer to the object's distance...are seen farther back in time". Thank you for this concise easy to understand 'redshift'. Up till now, my eyes always glazed over when reading anything re: redshift. This article beats any science fiction movies ever saw.

Thank you JPL
3 stars
DAVE WRIGHT from TENNESSEE said:
Good story.Can anyone even guess what this galaxy would look like now.Would most of the stars have already burned out?Can you actually tell how large and how many stars are in a galaxy this far away.one other thing,the big bang is only a theory,not fact.
MR JERRY ZOOK from MONTANA said:
I would surmise by the time the Webb telescope is launched and fully operational it may show these older galaxies may be more common than we thought.
3 stars
SAM NAUMAN from TEXAS said:
Again we keep assuming that the speed of light is the same all over the universe. We only know what it is here in our neighborhood. Differences in the speed of light would make the red shift different. This may even explain the ever increasing expansion of the universe that we think we observe. Oh well, there was a time when people thought the earth was flat-Some still do!
3 stars
JAMES FIREBAUGH from COLORADO said:
They say the universe is expanding so why is the Milky Way and the Andromeda galaxy's going to collide?
5 stars
CONNIE BROWN FLETCHER from MINNESOTA said:
Boy, this is fabulous! This means that the galaxy GN 108036 no longer exists, having done it's job of helping to seed the Universe? Awesome. I feel so humbled by all the astronomers that have given us insights into the night sky. Thank you.
PETER B HALL from WISCONSIN said:
Ok. I confuse easily. This galaxy appears as it was ~13B years ago. Can we see it today, or a reasonable facsimile thereof? If so, what does it look like, and where do we look for it? Or has it moved out of the observable universe? If it was on our side of the point of origin, wouldn't it still be with us in a more modern incarnation? Given that inflation was a brief and superluminal episode, is there anything in this ancient object that can either buttress or refute the inflation hypothesis?
4 stars
LARRY GARNER from FLORIDA said:
It amazes me, that first of all , we are able to light from that long ago, and B. that a galaxy that old is making stars at that rate still? I think Bill Simpson is right that other galaxies are colliding with it. If something is not happening I am sure it should have exsusted all star forming material by now?? (maybe.)
4 stars
CARLOS ZEITOUNE from VIRGINIA said:
Hi, folks! Maybe I'm not used to these verb tenses... otherwise, why "...one of the most distant galaxies known is churning out stars at a shockingly high rate." sounds too dated to me? Aren't we seeing the past? Ok, it's a philosofical and linguistics problem, more than a astronomical one... wouldn't it be more fair saying it "was churning out" at that time, instead? Anyway, dear Astronomy staff, I'll keep on track, along with your valuable help, trying to understand all these mysteries and phenomena.
2 stars
DEVAJ COLE SR said:
When scintist will be able to see light coming from 13.8 billion year ago
12
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me