|
|
Closest type Ia supernova in decades solves a cosmic mysteryScientists’ early observations confirmed some assumptions about the physics of type Ia supernovae, but with this close-up look, they also found things nobody had dreamed.
By
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California —
Published:
December 15, 2011 The Palomar Transient Factory caught SN 2011fe in the Pinwheel Galaxy in the vicinity of the Big Dipper on August 24, 2011. Found just hours after it exploded and only 21 million light-years away, the discovery triggered the closest-ever look at a young type Ia supernova. B. J. Fulton, Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network
Peter Nugent of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) heads the Computational Cosmology Center in the lab's Computational Research Division and also leads the lab's collaboration in the multi-institutional Palomar Transient Factory (PTF). On August 24 of this year, searching data as it poured into DOE's National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) from an automated telescope on Palomar Mountain in California, Nugent spotted a remarkable object. It was shortly confirmed as a type Ia supernova in the Pinwheel Galaxy, some 21 million light-years distant. That's unusually close by cosmic standards, and the nearest SN Ia since 1986; it was subsequently given the official name SN 2011fe.
"We caught the supernova just 11 hours after it exploded, so soon that we were later able to calculate the actual moment of the explosion to within 20 minutes,” said Nugent. “Our early observations confirmed some assumptions about the physics of type Ia supernovae, and we ruled out a number of possible models. But with this close-up look, we also found things nobody had dreamed of."
"When we saw SN2011fe, I fell off my chair," said Mansi Kasliwal from the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C., and the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. "Its brightness was too faint to be a supernova and too bright to be nova. Only follow-up observations in the next few hours revealed that this was actually an exceptionally young type Ia supernova."
Because they could closely study the supernova during its first few days, the team was able to gather the first direct evidence for what at least one SN Ia looked like before it exploded and what happened next.
Confirming a carbon-oxygen white dwarf
Scientists long ago developed models of type Ia supernovae based on their evolving brightness and spectra. The models assume the progenitor is a binary system — about half of all stars are in binary systems — in which a dense, small white-dwarf star made of carbon and oxygen orbits a companion from which it sweeps up additional matter. There's a specific limit to how massive the white dwarf can grow, equal to about 1.4 times the mass of our Sun, before it can no longer support itself against gravitational collapse.
"As it approaches the limit, conditions are met in the center so that the white dwarf detonates in a colossal thermonuclear explosion, which converts the carbon and oxygen to heavier elements including nickel," said Nugent. "A shock wave rips through it and ejects the material in a bright expanding photosphere. Much of the brightness comes from the heat of the radioactive nickel as it decays to cobalt. Light also comes from ejecta being heated by the shock wave, and if this runs into the companion star, it can be reheated, adding to the luminosity."
By examining how SN 2011fe's brightness evolved — its so-called early-time light curve — and the features of its early-time spectra, members of the PTF team were able to constrain how big the exploding star was when it erupted, what might have happened during the explosion, and what kind of binary star system was involved.
The first observations of SN 2011fe were carried out at the Liverpool Telescope at La Palma in the Canary Islands, followed within hours by the Shane Telescope at Lick Observatory in California and the Keck I Telescope on Mauna Kea in Hawaii. These were shortly followed by NASA's orbiting Swift Observatory.
"We made an absurdly conservative assumption that the earliest luminosity was due entirely to the explosion itself and would increase over time in proportion to the size of the expanding fireball, which set an upper limit on the radius of the progenitor,” said Nugent.
"It only takes a few seconds for the shock wave to tear apart the star, but the debris heated in the explosion will continue to glow for several hours,” said Daniel Kasen from the University of California, Berkeley. “The bigger the star, the brighter this afterglow. Because we caught this supernova so early and with such sensitive observations, we were able to directly constrain the size of the progenitor."
"Sure enough, it could only have been a white dwarf," said Nugent. "The spectra gave us the carbon and oxygen, so we knew we had the first direct evidence that a type Ia supernova does indeed start with a carbon-oxygen white dwarf."
The expected and the unexpected
"The early-time light curve also constrained the radius of the binary system," said Nugent, "so we got rid of a whole bunch of models," ranging from old red giant stars to other white dwarfs in a so-called ‘double-degenerate’ system.
“If there was a giant companion star orbiting nearby, we should have seen some fireworks when the debris from the supernova crashed into it,” said Kasen. A red giant would have made the supernova brighter by several orders of magnitude early on. "Because we didn't observe any bright flashes like that, we determined that the companion star could not have been much bigger than our Sun."
Nor was there much chance the companion was another white dwarf in a double-degenerate system, unless it had somehow avoided being torn apart and littering the surroundings with debris. A shock wave plowing through that kind of rubble would have produced a burst of early light the observers couldn't have missed. So unless the companion was positioned almost exactly between the exploding star and the observers on Earth, closer to it than one-tenth the diameter of our Sun — an unlikely set of circumstances — the white dwarf's companion had to be a main sequence star.
While these observations pointed to a "normal" SN Ia, the way the white dwarf exploded held surprises. Typical of what would be expected, early spectra obtained by the Lick 3-meter telescope showed many intermediate-mass elements spewing out of the expanding fireball, including ionized oxygen, magnesium, silicon, calcium, and iron, traveling 10,000 miles (16,000 kilometers) a second — more than 5 percent of the speed of light. Yet some oxygen was traveling much faster at over 12,000 miles (20,000km) a second.
"The high-velocity oxygen shows that the oxygen wasn't evenly distributed when the white dwarf blew up," Nugent said, "indicating unusual clumpiness in the way it was dispersed." But more interesting, he said, is that "whatever the mechanism of the explosion, it showed a tremendous amount of mixing, with some radioactive nickel mixed all the way to the photosphere. So the brightness followed the expanding surface almost exactly. This is not something any of us would have expected."
"Understanding how these giant explosions create and mix materials is important because supernovae are where we get most of the elements that make up the Earth and even our own bodies,” said Mark Sullivan from Oxford University in England. “For instance, these supernovae are a major source of iron in the universe. So we are all made of bits of exploding stars."
"It is rare that you have eureka moments in science, but it happened four times on this supernova," said Andy Howell from PTF's SN Ia team, "the super-early discovery; the crazy first spectrum; when we figured out it had to be a white dwarf; and then, the Holy Grail, when we figured out details of the second star."
"We're like Captain Ahab, except our white whale is a white dwarf,” said Howell from Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network. “We're obsessed with proving they cause supernovae, but the evidence has been eluding us for decades." This time, he says, "We got our whale ... and we lived."
|
|
 |
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content.
Learn more » |
Receive news, sky-event information, observing tips, and more from Astronomy's weekly e-mail newsletter
|