Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

"Failed stars" galore with one youngster only six times heftier than Jupiter

One cluster contains a surprising surplus of brown dwarfs; it harbors half as many of these astronomical oddballs as normal stars.
By Subaru Telescope Facility, Hilo, Hawaii Published: October 12, 2011
ngc1333
This photograph combines optical and infrared images taken with the Subaru Telescope. Brown dwarfs newly identified by the SONYC Survey are circled in yellow, while previously known brown dwarfs are circled in white. The arrow points to the least massive brown dwarf known in NGC 1333; it is only about six times heftier than Jupiter. Credit: SONYC Team/Subaru Telescope
An international team of astronomers has discovered more than 24 new free-floating brown dwarfs that reside in two young star clusters. One brown dwarf is a lightweight youngster only about six times heftier than Jupiter. What's more, one cluster contains a surprising surplus of brown dwarfs; it harbors half as many of these astronomical oddballs as normal stars. These findings come from deep surveys and extensive follow-up observations using the Subaru Telescope in Hawaii and the Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile, two of the world's largest optical-infrared telescopes.

Sometimes described as failed stars, brown dwarfs are unusual celestial objects that straddle the boundary between stars and planets. When young, they glow brightly from the heat of formation, but they eventually cool down and end up with atmospheres that exhibit planet-like characteristics.

During the course of the Substellar Objects in Nearby Young Clusters (SONYC) Survey, astronomers used the Subaru Telescope to take deep images of NGC 1333 and the Rho Ophiuchi star cluster at both optical and infrared wavelengths. Once they identified candidate brown dwarfs from their red colors, the research team verified their nature with spectra taken at Subaru and the VLT.

The six-Jupiter-mass brown dwarf found in the NGC 1333 cluster is one of the puniest free-floating objects known. "Its mass is comparable to those of giant planets, yet it doesn't circle a star. How it formed is a mystery," said Aleks Scholz from the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies in Ireland.

Several other newly identified brown dwarfs in both the NGC 1333 and Rho Ophiuchi clusters have masses that are less than 20 times the mass of Jupiter — placing them at the low end of the mass range for known brown dwarfs. "Brown dwarfs seem to be more common in NGC 1333 than in other young star clusters. That difference may be hinting at how different environmental conditions affect their formation," said Koraljka Muzic from the University of Toronto in Canada.

"Our findings suggest, once again, that objects not much bigger than Jupiter could form the same way as stars do. In other words, nature appears to have more than one trick up its sleeve for producing planetary-mass objects," said Ray Jayawardhana from the University of Toronto.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
RICHARD BLACK III from COLORADO said:
I aggree with Russell from CA. If the IAU can designate Pluto as a dwarf planet, why can't they aggree that "Brown Dwarfs" are really "Hyper Planets"? While they are mostly "free floating:, I'm sure that those within a stellar system have "cleared" their orbital plane. (yes, I still believe Pluto is a planet, and have for 45 years)
4 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
Why don't they just call them big planets. I guess you would need to know what they are made of to know their age. They may be the result of being outside the areas of high density in the early universe. They could be composed of more heavier elements recycled from exploded stars, that happened not to be near enough to stars to get vacuumed up by them, or may have been formed in an area of space of lower density matter that didn't allow them to accumulate enough mass to ignite as a star. Just because someone creates a theory of planet formation, doesn't make it correct for all planets. It is a random mess out there. (That darned randomness will eventually get us. The entropy thing. Bummer.)
It all makes me wonder if, without the gravity of dark matter, any stars and planets would have formed, or if space would be occupied with mostly gas and some dust floating around. In which case, you wouldn't need to buy Halloween candy. Or be tempted to eat most of it yourself.
3 stars
FRANCIS NYAKUNDI SR said:
Have been following astronomy thro' astronomy.com for more than a year, atleast daily. Thanks for a collection of a Creator's work now I can think beyond earth.
RUSSELL MILLS from CALIFORNIA said:
I suggest that we stop considering these brown dwarfs to be "failed stars" -- it implies that they are somehow "trying" to be stars. In reality they are not trying to do anything -- they are just astronomical bodies in a certain mass range with certain characteristics. Let's appreciate them for what they are.
5 stars
ROBERT MCCABE from NORTH CAROLINA said:
Maybe dark matter doesn't exist. Maybe it's really a bunch of red dwarfs and brown dwarfs that we haven't found yet.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me