Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Cosmic crashes forge gold

Detailed computer simulations indicate that violent mergers of neutron stars in binary systems likely are the main sources of the heaviest chemical elements in the universe.

By Max Planck Institute, Garching, Germany Published: September 9, 2011
Neutron star gold simulation
Various stages of the merger of two neutron stars are shown in this simulation sequence; the images cover a period of about one-hundredth of a second. Once the stars collide, material is squeezed out between the stars and gets stripped off from tidal tails. In the material ejected, a multitude of nuclear reactions takes place, producing heavy elements.
Photo by S. Goriely, A. Bauswein, and H.-T. Janka (MPA)

The cosmic site where the heaviest chemical elements such as lead or gold are formed has likely been identified: Ejected matter from neutron stars merging in a violent collision provides ideal conditions. In detailed numerical simulations, scientists of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (MPA) in Garching, Germany, and affiliated to the Excellence Cluster Universe and of the Free University of Brussels (ULB) in Belgium have verified that the relevant reactions of atomic nuclei do take place in this environment, producing the heaviest elements in the correct abundances.

Most heavy chemical elements are formed in nuclear fusion reactions in stars. Also in the center of our Sun, hydrogen is “burned” to create helium, thereby releasing energy. Heavier elements are then produced from helium if the star is more massive than our Sun. This process, however, only works up to iron; further fusion reactions do not yield any net energy gain. Therefore, heavier elements cannot be produced in this fashion. Instead, they can be assembled when neutrons are captured onto “seed” nuclei, which then decay radioactively.

This involves two main processes: the slow neutron capture (s-process), which takes place at low neutron densities inside stars during their late evolution stages, and the rapid neutron capture (r-process), which needs very high neutron densities. Physicists know that the r-process is responsible for producing a large fraction of the elements much heavier than iron, including platinum, gold, thorium, and plutonium. However, the question of which astrophysical objects can accommodate for this r-process remains to be answered.

“The source of about half of the heaviest elements in the universe has been a mystery for a long time,” said Hans-Thomas Janka, senior scientist at the MPA. “The most popular idea has been, and may still be, that they originate from supernova explosions that end the lives of massive stars. But newer models do not support this idea. “

Violent mergers of neutron stars in binary systems offer an alternative scenario, when the two stars collide after millions of years of spiraling toward each other. For the first time, scientists at the MPA and the ULB have now simulated all stages of the processes occurring in such mergers by detailed computer models. This includes both the evolution of the neutron star matter during the relativistic cosmic crashes and the formation of chemical elements in the tiny fraction of the whole matter that gets ejected during such events, involving the nuclear reactions of more than 5,000 atomic nuclei (chemical elements and their isotopes).

“In just a few split seconds after the merger of the two neutron stars, tidal and pressure forces eject extremely hot matter equivalent to several Jupiter masses,” explained Andreas Bauswein, who carried out the simulations at the MPA. Once this so-called plasma has cooled to less than 10 billion degrees, a multitude of nuclear reactions take place, including radioactive decays, which enable the production of heavy elements. “The heavy elements are `recycled’ several times in various reaction chains involving the fission of super-heavy nuclei, which makes the final abundance distribution become largely insensitive to the initial conditions provided by the merger model,” said Stephane Goriely, ULB researcher and nuclear astrophysics expert of the team. This agrees well with previous speculations that the reaction properties of the atomic nuclei involved should be the decisive determining factor because this is the most natural explanation for the essentially identical abundance distributions of the heaviest r-process elements observed in many old stars and in our solar system.

The simulations showed that the abundance distribution of the heaviest elements agrees very well with the one observed in our solar system. If one combines the results of the simulations and the estimated number of neutron star collisions in the Milky Way in the past, the figures indicate that such events could in fact be the main sources of the heaviest chemical elements in the universe.

The team plans now to conduct new studies to further improve the theoretical predictions by refined computer simulations that can follow the physical processes in even more detail. On the other hand, observational astronomers look out for detecting the transient celestial sources that should be associated with the ejection of radioactive matter in neutron star mergers. Because of the heating by radioactive decays, the ejecta will shine up with almost the brightness of a supernova explosion — albeit only for a few days. A discovery would mean the first observational hint of freshly produced r-process elements in the source of their origin.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL said:
This is very surprising news, as we have got used to thinking that all heavier elements were forged in supernovae. The collision of two neutron stars was once thought to be an exceptionally rare event, but some of the heavier elements are not particularly rare: barium, thorium and lead, for example. It is difficult to see how they could have been evenly distributed across the cosmos from such rare events, and in significant quantities: this should keep the theorists occupied for decades!
5 stars
NICO LARSON from COLORADO said:
Surprising theory for my day, I suppose. I'm looking forward to further information on this topic, and if these materials are " recycled" into other heavier elements, it's a wonder that we've the luck to have gotten any substantial amount of them at all!
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
The merging of two massive, dense neutron stars would seem to produce the density and pressure on matter for a longer duration than the explosion of a single star. I ofter wondered what would happen when two of them collided. Now I know. They make the only thing that just about everyone considers real money.
It gives you another way to try to comprehend how old the universe is. The gold you may have was made when two neutron stars hit out there somewhere and found its' way to this neighborhood of space as the solar system was forming. THAT took quite some time. I thought that since regular stars could make the elements up to iron in the periodic table, that everything below iron should be abundant on Earth, which is of course, wrong. It has to be due to the size of the stars, or the relative abundance of stars of certain sizes, or something else. Chromium and titanium don't seem too abundant, but are lighter than iron. Maybe iron just gathers together in more concentrated deposits easier? But since the entire center of the Earth is iron and nickel, that is probably wrong. Someone out there knows why chromium is so expensive and iron so cheap.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me