Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Black hole, star collisions may illuminate universe's dark side

Scientists unveiled a ready-made method for detecting the collision of stars with an elusive type of black hole.
By Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey Published: September 22, 2011
black-hole-simulation
Princeton and New York University researchers have simulated the effect of a primordial black hole passing through a star. Primordial black holes are among the objects hypothesized to make up dark matter — the invisible substance thought to constitute much of the universe — and astronomers could use the researchers' model to finally observe the elusive black holes. This image illustrates the resulting vibration waves as a primordial black hole (white dots) passes through the center of a star. The different colors correspond to the density of the primordial black hole and strength of the vibration. Credit: Tim Sandstrom
Scientists looking to capture evidence of dark matter — the invisible substance thought to constitute much of the universe — may find a helpful tool in the recent work of researchers from Princeton University in New Jersey and New York University (NYU).

The team unveiled a ready-made method for detecting the collision of stars with an elusive type of black hole, which is on the short list of objects believed to make up dark matter. Such a discovery could serve as observable proof of dark matter and provide a much deeper understanding of the universe’s inner workings.

Researchers Shravan Hanasoge from Princeton and Michael Kesden from NYU simulated the visible result of a primordial black hole passing through a star. Theoretical remnants of the Big Bang, primordial black holes possess the properties of dark matter and are one of various cosmic objects thought to be the source of the mysterious substance, but they have yet to be observed.

If primordial black holes are the source of dark matter, the sheer number of stars in the Milky Way galaxy — roughly 100 billion — makes an encounter inevitable. Unlike larger black holes, a primordial black hole would not “swallow” the star, but instead cause noticeable vibrations on the star’s surface as it passes through.

Thus, as the number of telescopes and satellites probing distant stars in the Milky Way increases, so do the chances to observe a primordial black hole as it slides harmlessly through one of the galaxy’s billions of stars, Hanasoge said. The computer model developed by Hanasoge and Kesden can be used with these current solar-observation techniques to offer a more precise method for detecting primordial black holes than existing tools.

“If astronomers were just looking at the Sun, the chances of observing a primordial black hole are not likely, but people are now looking at thousands of stars,” Hanasoge said.

“There’s a larger question of what constitutes dark matter, and, if a primordial black hole were found, it would fit all the parameters — they have mass and force so they directly influence other objects in the universe, and they don’t interact with light. Identifying one would have profound implications for our understanding of the early universe and dark matter.”

Although dark matter has not been observed directly, galaxies are thought to reside in extended dark-matter halos based on documented gravitational effects of these halos on galaxies’ visible stars and gas. Like other proposed dark-matter candidates, primordial black holes are difficult to detect because they neither emit nor absorb light, stealthily traversing the universe with only subtle gravitational effects on nearby objects.

Because primordial black holes are heavier than other dark-matter candidates, however, their interaction with stars would be detectable by existing and future stellar observatories, Kesden said. When crossing paths with a star, a primordial black hole’s gravity would squeeze the star, and then, once the black hole passed through, cause the star’s surface to ripple as it snaps back into place.

“If you imagine poking a water balloon and watching the water ripple inside, that’s similar to how a star’s surface appears,” Kesden said.

“By looking at how a star’s surface moves, you can figure out what’s going on inside. If a black hole goes through, you can see the surface vibrate.”

Eyeing the Sun’s surface for hints of dark matter
Kesden and Hanasoge used the Sun as a model to calculate the effect of a primordial black hole on a star’s surface. Kesden, whose research includes black holes and dark matter, calculated the masses of a primordial black hole as well as the likely trajectory of the object through the Sun. Hanasoge, who studies seismology in the Sun, Earth, and stars, worked out the black hole’s vibrational effect on the Sun’s surface.

NASA’s Tim Sandstrom created video simulations of the researchers’ calculations using the Pleiades supercomputer at the Ames Research Center in California. One clip shows the vibrations of the Sun’s surface as a primordial black hole — represented by a white trail — passing through its interior. A second movie portrays the result of a black hole grazing the Sun’s surface.

Marc Kamionkowski from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, said that the work serves as a toolkit for detecting primordial black holes, because Hanasoge and Kesden have provided a thorough and accurate method that takes advantage of existing solar observations.

“It’s been known that as a primordial black hole went by a star, it would have an effect, but this is the first time we have calculations that are numerically precise,” Kamionkowski said. “This is a clever idea that takes advantage of observations and measurements already made by solar physics. It’s like someone calling you to say there might be a million dollars under your front doormat. If it turns out to not be true, it cost you nothing to look. In this case, there might be dark matter in the data sets astronomers already have, so why not look?”

One significant aspect of Kesden and Hanasoge’s technique, Kamionkowski said, is that it narrows a significant gap in the mass that can be detected by existing methods of trolling for primordial black holes.

The search for primordial black holes has thus far been limited to masses too small to include a black hole, or so large that “those black holes would have disrupted galaxies in heinous ways we would have noticed,” Kamionkowski said. “Primordial black holes have been somewhat neglected, and I think that’s because there has not been a single, well-motivated idea of how to find them within the range in which they could likely exist.”

The current mass range in which primordial black holes could be observed was set based on previous direct observations of Hawking radiation — the emissions from black holes as they evaporate into gamma rays — as well as the bending of light around large stellar objects, Kesden said. The difference in mass between those phenomena, however, is enormous even in astronomical terms. Hawking radiation can only be observed if the evaporating black hole’s mass is less than 100 quadrillion grams. On the other end, an object must be larger than 100 septillion (24 zeroes) grams for light to visibly bend around it. The search for primordial black holes covered a swath of mass that spans a factor of 1 billion, Kesden said — similar to searching for an unknown object with a weight somewhere between that of a penny and a mining dump truck.

He and Hanasoge suggest a technique to give that range a much-needed trim and established more specific parameters for spotting a primordial black hole. The pair found through their simulations that a primordial black hole larger than 1 sextillion (21 zeroes) grams — roughly the mass of an asteroid — would produce a noticeable effect on a star’s surface.

“Now that we know primordial black holes can produce detectable vibrations in stars, we could try to look at a larger sample of stars than just our own Sun,” Kesden said.

“The Milky Way has 100 billion stars, so about 10,000 detectable events should be happening every year in our galaxy if we just knew where to look.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
JOHN C KREMER from COLORADO said:
My thougts are: Blackholes have no permanance (longevity) according to the Hawking's theory of emission radiation. The smaller the black hole the less permanance and the larger the black hole the longer the permanance. This puts a limit on how long the smaller primoridal black holes will last, which is indicated on the sizes of the primoridal black holes. This would indicate that most of the very smallest black holes after the big bang will have long ago dissappeared. Then about 8 billion years ago, the gravitational effects of this gigantic mass loss would have been overcome by the radiation effects of the expiring primoridal black holes. This effect will result in expansion of the universe, and as time goes on, the effect will increase the rate of expansion. Something similar to "Dark Energy"! But we still don't know about dark matter.
4 stars
GORDON STRADER from IDAHO said:
More detail on the size and weight of the black hole relative to the star would be helpful. Transit time through the star and an estimate of the mass the black hole would accumulate during passage would be nice to know.
3 stars
GREG CHRISTIANSON from MAINE said:
“The Milky Way has 100 billion stars, so about 10,000 detectable events should be happening every year in our galaxy if we just knew where to look.”

This still calculates out to a rare event by me: one primordial black hole collision per 100,000,000 stars per year. How could that many stars possibly be observed continuously for multiple years to observe at least one event?
4 stars
LARS LINDSTROM from PENNSYLVANIA said:
This is scary. The size of the event horizon of a black hole with a mass of, say, an asteroid, would be microscopic. But the size of the actual singularity would be zero, so it wouldn´t have any difficulty passing through anything at all. I wonder what the ripples in my skin would look like if one of these were passing through me...
STUART HERRING from ALABAMA said:
"...primordial black hole[s] ... don’t interact with light.”

"...primordial black holes are difficult to detect because they neither emit nor absorb light,"

I beg to differ. Black holes *do* interact with light, either by absorbing it or by bending space so as to curve a photon's path (even if only to a very small degree).
-------------------------------------------------------------

R. Screeton: A black hole can cause a nearby gamma-ray photon to dissociate into an electron-positron pair. If one of the particles then falls into the hole and the other escapes, the hole will lose a bit of mass/energy. The hole will have effectively emitted a particle. After enough such mass loss, the hole can no longer keep itself compressed unto the critical density, and it explodes.
5 stars
CHRIS R BAKER from CALIFORNIA said:
I have read that if there was a black hole with the mass of the Earth that it's even horizon would be 1 centimeter across. Not knowing how much the Earth weighs I cannot picture the size of these weights of black holes. The author should add that information to the article. But I can picture a black hole of Earth mass simply falling through the Sun and out the other side barely slowing in it's passage. I think that would also cause massive disruptions from the tidal forces involved. So I think these the author is discussing must be much smaller. Maybe pinhead size or smaller. Can someone confirm this or give an alternative?
Thanks
4 stars
BYRON GAIST said:
I'm not a professional astronomer or cosmologist, but one thought that comes to mind while reading this interesting article is: if we do observe "noticeable vibrations on the star’s surface", how will the possibility be excluded, that something other than a primordial black hole passing through the star is in fact causing those vibrations?
NARASIMHA DURG from MINNESOTA said:
I am unable to comprehend how can a blackhole pass through a star? Is the size of the blackhole is very small or is there is any limit for the star as well as for black hole ? Can any one through some light on these points.
4 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
So did the primordial black holes form shortly after the big bang at the same time the super massive black holes at the galaxy centers formed? How much of the dark matter do they account for? I wonder what happens when they hit a regular black hole or a neutron star?
4 stars
JOHN GABODA JR from NORTH CAROLINA said:
This article is very intriguing to me I have been doing independent research on Black Holes and dark matter but have only come to dead ends and false theories that have no concrete grounding in observations or mathematical formulae. To hear that people across the country are observing these events and are beginning to understand the machinations of the universe comes as a ray of hope that perhaps one day humankind may understand the way dark matter and black holes work.
12
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me