Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

What activates a supermassive black hole?

New data shows that mergers between galaxies did not trigger the majority of the more common, less bright active galaxies in the universe.
By ESO, Garching, Germany Published: July 13, 2011
COSMOS field
This deep image shows the COSMOS field imaged by the Canada France Hawaii Telescope (CFHT). Huge numbers of faint galaxies are visible. A new study of this field, combining data from ESO’s Very Large Telescope and ESA’s XMM-Newton X-ray space observatory has turned up a big surprise. Most of the black holes in the centers of active galaxies in the past 11 billion years were not turned on by mergers between galaxies, as had been previously thought. Some of the active galaxies with supermassive black holes at their centers that were used in the new study are marked with red crosses on this picture. CFHT/IAP/Terapix/CNRS/ESO
A new study combining data from the European Southern Observatory’s (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT) and the European Space Agency’s (ESA) XMM-Newton X-ray space observatory has turned up a surprise. Most of the huge black holes in the centers of galaxies in the past 11 billion years were not turned on by mergers between galaxies, as had been previously thought.

At the heart of most, if not all, large galaxies lurks a supermassive black hole with a mass millions, or sometimes billions, of times greater than that of the Sun. In many galaxies, including our own Milky Way, the central black hole is quiet. But in some galaxies, particularly early on in the history of the universe, the central monster feasts on material that gives off intense radiation as it falls into the black hole.

One unsolved mystery is where the material comes from to activate a sleeping black hole and trigger violent outbursts at a galaxy’s center, so that it then becomes an active galactic nucleus. Up to now, many astronomers thought that most of these active nuclei were turned on when two galaxies merge or when they pass close to each other and the disrupted material becomes fuel for the central black hole. However, new results indicate that this idea may be wrong for many active galaxies.

Viola Allevato from the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics in Garching, Germany, and an international team of scientists have now looked in detail at more than 600 of these active galaxies in an extensively studied patch of the sky called the COSMOS field. As expected, the astronomers found that extremely brilliant active nuclei were rare, while the bulk of the active galaxies in the past 11 billion years were only moderately bright. But there was a surprise — the new data showed that the majority of these more common, less bright active galaxies, even looking back far into the past, were not triggered by mergers between galaxies.

The X-rays emitted from around the black hole, which was picked up by ESA’s XMM-Newton space observatory, reveal the presence of active galactic nuclei. These galaxies were subsequently observed using ESO’s VLT, which was able to measure the distances to the galaxies. When combined, the observations allowed the team to make a 3-D map showing where the active galaxies lie. “It took more than 5 years, but we were able to provide one of the largest and most complete inventories of active galaxies in the X-ray sky,” said Marcella Brusa from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany.

The astronomers could use this new map to find out how the active galaxies were distributed and compare this with predictions from theory. They could also see how the distribution changed as the universe aged — all the way from about 11 billion years ago to almost the present day.

The team found that active nuclei are mostly found in large massive galaxies with lots of dark matter. This was a surprise and not consistent with the prediction from theory – if most active nuclei were a consequence of mergers and collisions between galaxies, it had been expected that they would be found in galaxies with moderate mass (about a trillion times the mass of the Sun). The team found that most active nuclei reside in galaxies with masses about 20 times larger than the value predicted by merger theory.

“These new results give us a new insight into how supermassive black holes start their meals,” said Allevato. “They indicate that black holes are usually fed by processes within the galaxy itself, such as disk instabilities and starbursts, as opposed to galaxy collisions.”

“Even in the distant past, up to almost 11 billion years ago, galaxy collisions can only account for a small percentage of the moderately bright active galaxies,” said Alexis Finoguenov from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics. At that time, galaxies were closer together so mergers were expected to be more frequent than in the more recent past, so the new results are all the more surprising.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
JOHN C KREMER from COLORADO said:
If globular clusters are as old as they seem to be, maybe they might be the progenitors of galaxies, and their debris is what is still left around many if not all galaxies. Perhaps they first formed around objects known as midsize blackholes, having only a few thousand sun masses. If so, maybe these globular clusters gravitated into larger and larger central masses and then started collision courses with other clusters forming the million and billion sun masses we find today at the centers of most all galaxies. The larger collections might collide to form quasars. Now we must find where those mid sized black holes came from!
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
Why would they think that most of the big galaxies were formed by mergers? Or did they ever think that? It seems to me that when matter formed shortly after the Big Bang, it was unevenly distributed. Stars were somewhat clumped up into chunks that eventually formed galaxies of different sizes as the Universe aged and expanded. Big galaxies may have had bigger black holes that could pull in a lot more material near them, close to the center of the galaxy. They could do this for a long time. The bigger galaxies may have even been denser near the center when they formed, so the black hole had a lot to pull in. Do we know what portion of galaxies are the result of mergers? I would guess that the mergers were more common in the early Universe when it was more dense. How galaxies collide may also be important. If the center of a spiral arm went directly into the black hole region of another galaxy during a collision, we might expect quite a show for millions of years. Until we know a lot more about most of the Universe, the dark matter, it will be difficult to be certain about a lot of this stuff. Just because you can make a mathematical model of some process, doesn't mean that it will actually occur. Your model may miss something important. It would be cool to know how much of the matter the black holes have already consumed. I would guess that they got most of it as they formed very early in the creation of everything, at least everything that we know about. Which, of course, could be some minuscule fraction of what exists. Some day someone may figure it all out. Check out 'New Spin Revealed on Mysterious Antimatter' at www.livescience.com Some professor may have figured out why the amount of matter and antimatter does match after all - measurement error induced by frame dragging of space time by big galaxies. That is pretty cool. No, VERY cool, if correct.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me