Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Nature's best magnifying glass views an early spiral galaxy

Scientists can distinguish the galactic core and spiral arms of Sp1149, so this early galaxy is a great specimen for testing different models of how galaxies are born and then grow up to be places like our own Milky Way Galaxy.

By W. M. Keck Observatory, Kamuela, Hawaii Published: May 31, 2011
kewley
The gravity of a gigantic cluster of galaxies has bent and magnified the light of the distant spiral galaxy Sp1149, making its spiral arms visible and available for study by astronomers. Normally, gravitational lensing distorts the structures of distant galaxies beyond recognition. The inset labeled "galaxy" shows how Sp1149 would look without lensing.
Photo by Karen Teramura (University of Hawaii Institute for Astronomy)
Astronomers in Hawaii have plucked unprecedented details from the life of an early galaxy using an unusually lucid gravitational lens coupled with the powerful 10-meter Keck II Telescope on Mauna Kea.

Gravitational lenses are nature’s largest telescopes, created by colossally massive clusters of thousands of galaxies that bend and magnify the light of more distant objects behind them in a way similar to a glass lens. But gravitational lenses are far from perfect. Though they make very distant galaxies from the early universe visible to telescopes, they also put the images through a cosmic blender. As a result, the smeared and distorted images don’t offer much in the way of direct information about what the earliest galaxies looked like.

But that is not the case for an elegant little spiral galaxy called Sp1149, located 9.3 billion light-years away. The galaxy’s image has come through a gravitational lens magnified 22 times and fairly intact, as seen in a Hubble Space Telescope image that was first observed in detail by the University of Hawaii’s Tiantian Yuan. The Hubble images were initially taken by Harald Ebeling from Hawaii and published by Graham P. Smith and colleagues in 2009. The giant cluster of galaxies that created the lens is located in the vast expanse of space between Sp1149 and Earth, and appears beside Sp1149 in the Hubble image.

The secret to Sp1149’s successful magnification is that it is in a special position behind the cluster which allows its light to be bent equally in all directions, explained astronomer Lisa Kewley of the University of Hawaii at Manoa.

“We’re lucky that it’s not being terribly distorted,” said Kewley. “Something so far away that’s not lensed would look like a blurred dot.”

The fact that you can distinguish the galactic core and spiral arms of Sp1149, plus the fact that we are seeing the galaxy as it was when the universe was only a third of its current age, makes it a great specimen for testing different models of how galaxies are born and then grow up to be places like our own Milky Way Galaxy.

To that end, Yuan, Kewley, and their colleagues aimed the Keck II telescope at Sp1149. With the help of Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics (which cancels out much of the optical distortions caused by Earth’s atmosphere) and the OSIRIS instrument (which filters out the noise created by hydroxyl molecules in Earth’s atmosphere), the researchers were able to get an unprecedented look at the distributions of elements in Sp1149. Oxygen, in particular, is very revealing because the element accumulates more in the older stellar neighborhoods — the parts of galaxies where stars have lived and died more. In the case of Sp1149, the oxygen distribution spoke volumes.

“The oxygen in the spiral galaxy was much more concentrated at the center,” said Kewley. “They had a lot of star formation at the center.”

This sharp oxygen gradient, from core to outer disk, suggests that stars in the cores of galaxies form first and create the oldest stellar neighborhoods in Sp1149, followed later by the disk and arms. That supports what’s called the inside-out model of galactic evolution, she said.

“This is an idea that has been out there,” said Kewley. “Some models predict the opposite. It’s been an open question for a long time.” What has been needed was something other than a local galaxy to study to see how the oxygen gradients looked much earlier in a galaxy’s history. Without that, astronomers would have nothing but middle-aged galaxies to judge from. They would be like a biologist studying the lives of frogs without ever having seen a tadpole.

“This is the first time anyone has done such a detailed and precise oxygen gradient that wasn’t on a local galaxy,” said Kewley.

Now that the team has found one galactic tadpole, they are hunting for more. They also are hoping to study some galaxies that are midway between the ages of our local galaxies and Sp1149. With these samples from different ages, Kewley and her colleagues hope to piece together a much clearer life history of galaxies like our own.


Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
JOHN MOES from MICHIGAN said:
"spiral galaxy called Sp1149, located 9.3 billion light-years away. , , . The giant cluster of galaxies that created the lens is located in the vast expanse of space between Sp1149 and Earth,"

Did Sp1149 emit the light we see 4.45 billion years BPP (post big bang)? If so, wasn't the radius of the visible universe only one third its present size then? Wasn't the distance between our galaxy and Sp1149 only 3.1 billion light-years when that light was emitted? The cluster was between then already. Reduce the radius by two thirds, how does that change the volume and density?
4 stars
STEPHEN ARMSTRONG from CALIFORNIA said:
What does MOND Theory have to say about galaxy clusters, and the way the clusters lens the light from distant sources? If astronomers are using only Newtonian/Einstein-ian calculations to "unbend" the light into discernible images, doesn't that disprove MOND as a viable theory? Furthermore, would the method also not absolutely prove the dark matter theory true? But, distant sources are used to "map" dark matter distribution in a cluster. That means that astronomers must somehow know the "correct" shape of the distant object, in order to reverse-engineer the cluster mass distribution to account for the distortion! How can that be? It's not like the distant source is a "guide star" in an adaptive optics system! Also, the graphic in the article shows "how Sp1149 would look without lensing." How can THAT be determined from our single vantage point here on Earth? A major point of the article is the convenient happenstance OF this particular chance alignment, allowing the 22X magnification of Sp1149! I think that Sp1149 should be used to determine, once and for all, the plausibility of MOND over (dark) matter. Pun intended.
4 stars
MR CHARLES ISBELL from TEXAS said:
Very interesting. Very exciting! Are we now 1-step closer to top of
the ladder?
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me