Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Texas astronomers find super-luminous supernova

Research reveals that Supernova 2008am is the brightest “self-interacting” supernova discovered.
By McDonald Observatory at University of Texas, Austin Published: March 29, 2011
SN2008am
A follow-up image of supernova 2008am. D. Perley & J. Bloom/W.M. Keck Observatory
Astronomers led by Emmanouil "Manos" Chatzopoulos and J. Craig Wheeler from The University of Texas at Austin have found another extremely bright, rare supernova to add to the new class of exploding stars that University of Texas astronomers identified a few years ago. Supernova 2008am is one of the most intrinsically bright exploding stars ever observed. The team's research reveals that this supernova is the brightest "self-interacting" supernova discovered. In this type of stellar explosion, the extreme brightness is caused by interaction between the explosion shock wave and a shell of material previously expelled from the star.

Supernova 2008am is 3.7 billion light-years away. At its peak luminosity, it was over 100 billion times brighter than the Sun. It emitted enough energy in one second to satisfy the power needs of the United States for one million times longer than the universe has existed. In-depth studies of this supernova are helping the team understand the science behind this new class of exploding stars.

The ROTSE Supernova Verification Project (RSVP), formerly called the Texas Supernova Search, which uses the 18-inch robotic ROTSE IIIb Telescope at The University of Texas at Austin’s McDonald Observatory, discovered the supernova. It was followed up by astronomers using some of the world's largest ground-based telescopes, as well as telescopes in space in a variety of wavelengths. These include the Hobby-Eberly Telescope, the Keck Telescope, PAIRITEL, the Very Large Array, and the Swift satellite.

Chatzopoulos' detailed analysis of the light from SN 2008am revealed that it is not a pair-instability supernova — the explosion of a massive star the light from which is powered by radioactive decay. Rather, this supernova's extraordinary luminosity most likely comes from interaction between the debris from the star's explosion running into an envelope of gas around the star that the star had previously ejected. This model is called "circumstellar interaction."

The researchers suspect that the progenitor star for this supernova might have been of the type known as a "luminous blue variable." These massive stars puff off layers of material in episodes. The most famous example is Eta Carinae.

Prior to this discovery, the Texas Supernova Search found the first two "brightest supernovae ever" in SN 2005ap and 2006gy. The group has found five of the dozen published examples of this new class of stars, which it has dubbed “super-luminous supernovae,” (SLSNe).

SLSNe are about 100 times brighter than standard core-collapse supernovae, but extremely rare. Normal supernovae go off at a rate of about one per century in a galaxy; SLSNe may be more than a thousand times more rare.

"We're now in the process of converting our discoveries into real science rather than just a new thing," Wheeler said. "That makes it a little bit less flashy, but of course that's where the science really is, digging deeply into the nature of these very bright events. This new supernova has given us important new clues to their behavior."
rotse
The Robotic Optical Transient Search Experiment has placed telescopes in four locations on Earth to cover the entire sky in search of gamma-ray bursts. One of these, ROTSE IIIb, is located at McDonald Observatory. In addition to its primary mission, the telescope is used for the ROTSE Supernova Verification Project (RSVP). ROTSE collaboration
Studies of SLSNe have led to new insights, Chatzopoulos said. "For the first time, we're probing high-mass stellar death. The traditional ideas we have about how supernovae are powered, why they are so bright, do not seem to apply for the case of these super-luminous supernovae. There are other mechanisms involved."

Not all SLSNe are the same. "There's a variety of progenitor stars that can give different outcomes," Chatztopoulos said. "It's a zoo." The common factor is their luminosity.

The fate of different stars depends on their mass, Wheeler said. He defines three categories of high-mass stars that explode as supernovae:

In the least massive case, around 10 to 20 solar masses, a star collapses in on itself because its iron core cannot hold out against the crushing gravity of the star's weight. This is the classic "core-collapse supernova" with normal brightness.
The second progenitor category consists of more-massive stars, perhaps up to 100 solar masses. This type of star puffs off layers of material before it dies. The interaction between the supernova ejecta and the previously puffed-off material can cause the supernova to brighten to the super-luminous range.

The final category includes the most massive progenitor stars, those more than 100 solar masses. In this case, "the current state of the art predicts that they make matter and antimatter, electron-positron pairs, because they are so hot," Wheeler said. "That process destabilizes the whole star, and it contracts, ignites the thermonuclear fuel, and then explodes, blowing the whole star up." These are called "pair-instability" supernovae.

Of the three types of explosions Wheeler describes, the first two would leave behind a stellar remnant in the form of a neutron star or black hole. The third and most massive, though, would explode completely, leaving no remnant.

Though they set a record, the team isn't finished studying super-luminous supernovae. Their work on understanding SN 2008am might explain the origins of half of the known examples, but as Wheeler said, "To a scientist, the interesting thing is, what's the other half? We want to understand them all before we're done."


Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
EUGENE GOLDSMITH from ILLINOIS said:
It seems to me that if we (the World) knew more about the realities of our existence of who, what, how, why, and where we are going....what stems from a beginning, we (the World) would be happier with less animosity towards one another (nations). I, for one, feel awed, respectful, and amazed at my existence and that of other fellow men because of the knowledge I have gleaned from the reading of the Astronomy magazine covering the subjects of astronomy and cosmology . Our grade and high schooling system should incorporate educational material that reflects all the subject matter that the Astronomy magazine covers. If they would I believe our children would mature with a greater respect for our existence and have less animosity toward their existence and one another (nations).
MIROSLAV KRIZ from TEXAS said:
13,7 billion years times 1000000 is 13 700 000 000 000 000 years. That's a serious number, beyond my comprehention. How the astronomers can calculate this monster ???
5 stars
CHRIS R BAKER from CALIFORNIA said:
I thought there was also a type of supernova that had as it's progenitor a neutron star that explodes when it accumulates matter on it's surface to the point of instability. Wouldn't that make 4 major types of supernova?
4 stars
FERNANDO G VACA from TEXAS said:
Ditto what my fellow subscribers wrote before me! I have been a reader / subscriber of Astronomy Magazine for close to 30 years. I will continue to read this superlative magazine until I go to my reward "somewhere" in these glorious heavens that I have been reading and studying for these many years. By training, I am a mathematician. It just fascinates me to read about the immensity of distances involved in astronomy. I have also been very fortunate in having visited the McDonald Observatory 4 times and staying at the Indian Lodge park.
5 stars
MR CHARLES ISBELL from TEXAS said:
NOTE: This is NOT an April 1st comment!
This article is a very informative article, reported by two very
knowlegable astronomers. They are doing, and informing us, in
"not too advanced" terminology where I go to sleep trying to
understand what they say.
Interesting, informative and understandable (by me).
Keep up the great articles!
5 stars
JOHN A STAFFIERI from NEW YORK said:
THE BEST AND SMARTEST SUBSCRIPTION I'VE EVER MADE AND
CONTINUE TO RENEW!!!!!
5 stars
CLIVE DAGLISH said:
There not anything I dislike about your magazine its the best astronomy magazine in the world I wouldn't subscribe to it if I thought otherwise,you all are doing a wonderful job I look foreward to receiving my next magazine & reading more of what you publish within.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me