Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Cosmology standard candle not so standard after all

The findings will help astronomers make more precise measurements of the size, age, and expansion rate of our universe.
By Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California Published: January 13, 2011
standard candle
This image illustrates how NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope was able to show that a "standard candle" used to measure cosmological distances is shrinking — a finding that affects precise measurements of the age, size, and expansion rate of our universe. NASA/JPL-Caltech/Iowa State
Astronomers have turned up the first direct proof that "standard candles" used to illuminate the size of the universe, termed Cepheids, shrink in mass, making them not quite as standard as once thought. The findings made with NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope will help astronomers make more precise measurements of the size, age, and expansion rate of our universe.

Standard candles are astronomical objects that make up the rungs of the so-called cosmic distance ladder, a tool for measuring the distances to farther and farther galaxies. The ladder's first rung consists of pulsating stars called Cepheid variables, or Cepheids for short. Measurements of the distances to these stars from Earth are critical in making precise measurements of even more distant objects. Each rung on the ladder depends on the previous one, so without accurate Cepheid measurements, the whole cosmic distance ladder would come unhinged.

Now, new observations from Spitzer show that keeping this ladder secure requires even more careful attention to Cepheids. The telescope's infrared observations of one particular Cepheid provide the first direct evidence that these stars can lose mass — or essentially shrink. This could affect measurements of their distances.

"We have shown that these particular standard candles are slowly consumed by their wind," said Massimo Marengo of Iowa State University at Ames. "When using Cepheids as standard candles, we must be extra careful because, much like actual candles, they are consumed as they burn."

The star in the study is Delta Cephei, which is the namesake for the entire class of Cepheids. It was discovered in 1784 in the constellation Cepheus the King. Intermediate-mass stars can become Cepheids when they are middle-aged, pulsing with a regular beat that is related to how bright they are. This unique trait allows astronomers to take the pulse of a Cepheid and figure out how bright it is intrinsically or how bright it would be if you were right next to it. By measuring how bright the star appears in the sky and comparing this to its intrinsic brightness, it can then be determined how far away it must be.

This calculation was famously performed by astronomer Edwin Hubble in 1924, leading to the revelation that our galaxy is just one of many in a vast cosmic sea. Cepheids also helped in the discovery that our universe is expanding, and that galaxies are drifting apart.

Cepheids have since become reliable rungs on the cosmic distance ladder, but mysteries about these standard candles remain. One question has been whether they lose mass. Winds from a Cepheid star could blow off significant amounts of gas and dust, forming a dusty cocoon around the star that would affect how bright it appears. This, in turn, would affect calculations of its distance. Previous research had hinted at such mass loss, but more direct evidence was needed.

Marengo and his colleague used Spitzer's infrared vision to study the dust around Delta Cephei. This particular star is racing along through space at high speeds, pushing interstellar gas and dust into a bow shock up ahead. Luckily for the scientists, a nearby companion star happens to be lighting the area, making the bow shock easier to see. By studying the size and structure of the shock, the team was able to show that a strong, massive wind from the star is pushing against the interstellar gas and dust. In addition, the team calculated that this wind is up to 1 million times stronger than the wind blown by our Sun. This proves that Delta Cephei is shrinking slightly.

Follow-up observations of other Cepheids conducted by the same team using Spitzer have shown that other Cepheids — up to 25 percent observed — are also losing mass.

"Everything crumbles in cosmology studies if you don't start up with the most precise measurements of Cepheids possible," said Pauline Barmby of the University of Western Ontario, Canada. "This discovery will allow us to better understand these stars, and use them as ever more precise distance indicators."

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
JOHN HUUS from INDIANA said:
What does this information do, if anything, to the calculations that the universe is expanding in an accelerated manner?
DR JOHN OCCHUIZZO from PENNSYLVANIA said:
Was it not a woman, Henrietta Lovett, who established the link between absolute luminosity and pulsation rate for Cepheids? Correct me if I'm wrong.
5 stars
BRUCE A SINTON said:
IVAN ,
Astronomers know that they cannot get perfect values of distance,luminosity ,mass etc. , they just try to get as good as possible with the tools and knowledge available .

As time goes by they get closer to the true values.
ORRIN LOFTIN from MONTANA said:
Can we establish a Cepheid standard as a constant such that any shift from that can be taken into account,....
DOMINIC SNYDER from PENNSYLVANIA said:
WOW! Thats pretty cool!
4 stars
ALLEN ROBNETT from TENNESSEE said:
All measurements, of course, are relative. It is impossible to measure anything exactly. The best we can hope for is increasing precision. It surprised me to find that the distance to Betelguese is said to be 430 + or - 100 ly. The precision is about 25%. Still, we are much better off than we were 100 years ago, when it was thought that our own galaxy was all that there was.
4 stars
JOSEPH T MCCAWLEY from MASSACHUSETTS said:
This is very significant because the accuracy of Cepheids is the most basic "tried and true" of the cosmic deep sky distance ladder.
It serves to calibrate the methods used to go even deeper. Imagine that the chain on the first down markers used during a football game shrunk somehow during the game and no one realized it. By the 4th quarter a first down wouldn't really be a first down anymore.
3 stars
JAMES LUMMEL said:
Remember that 99.9% of cosmology is simply "best guess" anyways and this discovery allows this "best guess" to get better... Yea for our team!! (Hey, you work with what you got in front of you, just like every other science!)
2 stars
DAVID MAJORS from CALIFORNIA said:
This does explain some of the scatter in the P-L relation. Just goes to show-the more our observational capabilities improve- the more we find our models aren't as good as we thought.
4 stars
ROGER MOORE JR from MISSOURI said:
Yet another example of how the mysteries of our universe have yet to fail to perplex us and put us in our cosmological place. We can study for the next thousand years and still, MAYBE, scratch the surface.
12
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me