Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Astronomers find most distant galaxy candidate yet seen

The study pushed the limits of Hubble’s capabilities and revealed evidence of a rapid build-up of early galaxies.
By University of California - Santa Cruz Published: January 26, 2011
Hubble-ultra-deep-field
This image of the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field is part of the deepest infrared image ever taken of the universe. The small blue box outlines the area where astronomers found what may be the most distant galaxy ever seen, 13.2 billion light-years away, meaning its light was emitted just 480 million years after the Big Bang. It is small and faint and is shown separately in the larger box. NASA/ESA/Garth Illingworth (UC Santa Cruz)/Rychard Bouwens (UC Santa Cruz and Leiden University)/the HUDF09 Team
Astronomers studying ultra-deep imaging data from the Hubble Space Telescope have found what may be the most distant galaxy ever seen, about 13.2 billion light-years away. The study pushed the limits of Hubble's capabilities, extending its reach back to about 480 million years after the Big Bang when the universe was just 4 percent of its current age.

"We're getting back very close to the first galaxies, which we think formed around 200 to 300 million years after the Big Bang," said Garth Illingworth from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

Illingworth and Rychard Bouwens from Leiden University in the Netherlands led the study. Using infrared data gathered by Hubble's Wide Field Planetary Camera 3 (WFC3), they were able to see dramatic changes in galaxies over a period from about 480 to 650 million years after the Big Bang. The rate of star birth in the universe increased by 10 times during this 170-million-year period.

"This is an astonishing increase in such a short period, just 1 percent of the current age of the universe," Illingworth said.

There were also striking changes in the numbers of galaxies detected. "Our previous searches had found 47 galaxies at somewhat later times when the universe was about 650 million years old. However, we could only find one galaxy candidate just 170 million years earlier," Illingworth said. "The universe was changing very quickly in a short amount of time."

According to Bouwens, these findings are consistent with the hierarchical picture of galaxy formation in which galaxies grew and merged under the gravitational influence of dark matter. "We see a very rapid build-up of galaxies around this time," Bouwens said. "For the first time now, we can make realistic statements about how the galaxy population changed during this period and provide meaningful constraints for models of galaxy formation."

Astronomers gauge the distance of an object from its redshift, a measure of how much the expansion of space has stretched the light from an object to longer — redder — wavelengths. The newly detected galaxy has a likely redshift value of 10.3, which corresponds to an object that emitted the light we now see 13.2 billion years ago, just 480 million years after the birth of the universe.

"This result is on the edge of our capabilities, but we spent months doing tests to confirm it, so we now feel pretty confident," Illingworth said.

The galaxy, a faint smudge of starlight in the Hubble images, is tiny compared to the massive galaxies seen in the local universe. Our own Milky Way, for example, is more than 100 times larger.

The researchers also described three other galaxies with redshifts greater than 8.3. The study involved a thorough search of data collected from deep imaging of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF), a small patch of sky about one-tenth the size of the Moon. During two 4-day stretches in summer of 2009 and summer of 2010, Hubble focused on one tiny spot in the HUDF for a total exposure of 87 hours with the WFC3 infrared camera.

To go beyond redshift 10, astronomers will have to wait for Hubble's successor, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which NASA plans to launch later this decade. JWST will also be able to perform the spectroscopic measurements needed to confirm the reported galaxy at redshift 10.

"It's going to take JWST to do more work at higher redshifts. This study at least tells us that there are objects around at redshift 10 and that the first galaxies must have formed earlier than that," Illingworth said.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
ROBERT XXXX from ILLINOIS said:
If the universe is expanding as some claim then the BBT creates many more questions then it answers starting with what is the universe expanding INTO?
4 stars
JOSEPH T MCCAWLEY from MASSACHUSETTS said:
Intriguing, but we need more data and corroborating evidence before we once again go jumping through hoops that may not be there...
ORRIN LOFTIN from MONTANA said:
The concept of seeing back to when only 4% of what exists existed is astonishing,...
EDWARD OLSHEWSKI from ALABAMA said:
Consider this...If the universe sprang into existence from a single point, whether 13.6 billion years ago or last week, the number of points in the present universe must still be one...or we would have to account for how and where the other points came from? It seems obvious that the present universe has many more than one point to its make-up,so either our concept of a point is flawed, or the mystery of the size of the universe is deeper still...
DOMINIC SNYDER from PENNSYLVANIA said:
The Hubble Telescope is to powerful!
PHIL SWANSON SR from IOWA said:
No matter how far out it goes, there is no end to it
JOHN MOES from MICHIGAN said:
Stephen writes: "Think of it this way: Universe age=13.7B. One single star the[n] would require a sphere of 27.4BLY diameter just to contain it's light." True. So (ignoring inflation) one second after the BB that star, A, would require a sphere of 600,000 km to contain its light. Two stars, B & C, on opposite sides of A's sphere, 300,000 km away from A at that time, would also have emitted light one second PBB. If A's sphere has been expanding since then, the distance between A and B has been increasing at the same rate as the distance between A's light and A, and at the same rate as between B's light and B. Therefore C will never see light from B. The distance between B and C is increasing at twice the speed of light. C is not in B's visible universe. Shouldn't we conclude, therefore, that If visible light has passed through no more that 13.7B light years of space, then no emitter of that light is farther away than 13.7B light years? The Universe may well be infinite, but the VISIBLE part of it can't be more than 27.4B.
EDWARD OLSHEWSKI from ALABAMA said:
My take on these observations is that as long as we use light or electromagnetic radiation, we, either here on earth now,or in that ancient galaxy 13.2 bly away can only look backward in time. If they had a Hubble they might have detected an object 13.2 bly in their past but would not have seen the Milkyway as it has evolved over time that has not yet transpired. If looking into the future was possible we would be monitoring the merger of Andromeda and the Milkyway wich we obviously are not doing.
MILTON BRENER from NEW YORK said:
Stephen, thanks for your input. You seem to be challenging the idea of putting any limit on the size of the universe, which is one thing many scientists would support. My question has to do with the expansion of the known universe, and increasing separation between galaxies. Even granting a finite size universe, 13.7 BLY, I don't understand why at any point in it, one would measure 13.7 in any direction. Are we all in the center? Those who talk about an xpanding universe, and those who talk of 13.7, or even 27.4 B LY as the size, seem to me to be ships passing each other in the night.
JAY FREEDMAN from CONNECTICUT said:
This galaxy that is 13.2 billion light years away obviously no longer exists. The Hubble telescope is actually providing us with time travel back into the past. Future telescopes will hopefully provide evidence of a multiverse that at the moment is only a theory. The most enlightening revelations about our universe are yet to be discovered.
12
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me