Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Venus holds warning for Earth

Injecting our atmosphere with sulfur droplets to mitigate climate change may not be a good idea as once thought.
By ESA, Noordwijk, Netherlands Published: December 1, 2010
Venus-clouds
Close-up on venusian cloud structures at the south pole.
Photo by ESA/MPS/DLR/IDA
Scientists have finally explained mysterious high-altitude layer of sulfur dioxide discovered by the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Venus Express. As well as telling us more about Venus, it could be a warning against injecting our atmosphere with sulfur droplets to mitigate climate change.

Venus is blanketed in sulfuric acid clouds that block our view of the surface. The clouds form at altitudes of 30–45 miles (50–70 kilometers) when sulfur dioxide from volcanoes combines with water vapor to make sulfuric acid droplets. Any remaining sulfur dioxide should be destroyed rapidly by the intense solar radiation above 45 miles (70 km).

So the detection of a sulfur dioxide layer at 55–70 miles (90–110 km) by ESA's Venus Express orbiter in 2008 posed a complete mystery. Where did that sulfur dioxide come from?

Now, computer simulations by Xi Zhang from the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena and colleagues from America, France, and Taiwan show that some sulfuric acid droplets may evaporate at high altitudes, freeing gaseous sulfuric acid that is then broken apart by sunlight, releasing sulfur dioxide gas.

"We had not expected the high-altitude sulfur layer, but now we can explain our measurements," said Hakan Svedhem from ESA. "However, the new findings also mean that the atmospheric sulfur cycle is more complicated than we thought."

As well as adding to our knowledge of Venus, this new understanding may be warning us that proposed ways of mitigating climate change on Earth may not be as effective as originally thought.

Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen has recently advocated injecting artificially large quantities of sulfur dioxide into Earth's atmosphere at around 12 miles (20 km) to counteract global warming resulting from increased greenhouse gases.

The proposal stems from observations of powerful volcanic eruptions, in particular the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines that shot sulfur dioxide up into Earth's atmosphere. Reaching 12 miles (20 km) in altitude, the gas formed small droplets of concentrated sulfuric acid, like those found in Venus' clouds, which then spread around Earth. The droplets created a haze layer that reflected some of the Sun's rays back into space, cooling the whole planet by about 1° Fahrenheit (0.5° Celsius).

However, the new work on the evaporation of sulfuric acid on Venus suggests that such attempts at cooling our planet may not be as successful as first thought. We do not know how quickly the initially protective haze will be converted back into gaseous sulfuric acid — this is transparent and so allows all the Sun's rays through.

"We must study in great detail the potential consequences of such an artificial sulfur layer in the atmosphere of Earth," said Jean-Loup Bertaux from the University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin, France. "Venus has an enormous layer of such droplets, so anything that we learn about those clouds is likely to be relevant to any geo-engineering of our own planet."

In effect, nature is doing the experiment for us, and Venus Express allows us to learn the lessons before experimenting with our own world.
Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
1 star
JERRY JACULBA said:
ah ok
MARTIN LANG from CALIFORNIA said:
Wow! That was an interesting fact! In addition to that, the National Climatic Data Center has got the final news on 2010: It was the hottest year on record. Really, 2010 ties 2005 as hottest year, but that's still an achievement, considering that official data has been kept since 1880. The average temperature taken at ground level was 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit lower than the 20th century average, writes USA Today. Start taking out payday loans for emergency preparedness sets, because with temperatures climbing like this you never know whenever you will need them.

LARS LINDSTROM from PENNSYLVANIA said:
CO2 is probably one of the causes of global warming, but I suspect the last decades of increasing solar activity also has something to do with it. Also, the global mean temperature has varied a lot the last milennia. 3000 years ago, the Scandinavian mountain chain was covered with woods to the tops - old stumps give witness to that. My high school teacher told us that the global mean temperature was a couple of degrees centigrade higher than today in those days, too. We`re living in interesting times!
JOHN A CESARI SR from NEW YORK said:
I'M A BELIEVER THAT THE EARTH DOES CHANGE EVERY SO OFTEN AND WILL OVERCOME EVERYTHING WE DO. COLD PERIODS AND HOT PERIODS WILL HAPPEN. CLIMATE CHANGE IS INEVITABLE.
JOHN DUCK said:
Someone forget to tell the scientists that "Global Warming" on Earth has been dismissed as a load of rubbish due to bad science?
The only reason a warming trend was showing on Earth is because between the 1970's and 1990's, Scientists had scrapped 1200 temperature monitoring stations, largely from colder parts of Earth:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100022474/climategate-goes-american-noaa-giss-and-the-mystery-of-the-vanishing-weather-stations/

Climategate, anyone?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/

We're apparently heading into a Mini Ice age as of last winter, according to another group of scientists
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242011/DAVID-ROSE-The-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html
4 stars
ROBERT MCCABE from NORTH CAROLINA said:
The proposal to put sulfur dioxide into our atmosphere is rediculous. It would take a number of years, and trillions of dollars just to duplicate the amount that a volcano can put out in a matter or days. And the guy proposing this won the Nobel Prize?
GRANT BOOTH from OREGON said:
Sounds like perhaps we should consider altering the source of the problem, rather than toying with the conditions that enable the Earth to sustain us. Seems like a no-brainer.
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
The fossil fuels will be gone before the carbon dioxide builds up to a dangerous level. Although methane released by the warming might be a BIG problem. We couldn't afford to get that much SO2 up there anyway. Nuclear power is the answer. Waste can be managed in one spot. Bill Gates likes the traveling wave reactor.
The scientists are trying to get more government funding, as they tend to do, since pure science often has no short term economic return.
2 stars
KRIS GRAUEL from TENNESSEE said:
The article forgot to mention that Di-hydogen oxide (H2O) is by far the most prevalent greenhouse gas. The overall effect of CO2 is negligible. Moreover, plants consume CO2 so more CO2 means..... more plants! And what do plants like temperaturewise? Warmth! Besides, when has our climate, any climate, EVER stayed the same? it just doesn"t happen. Climate change occurs throughout the solar system, whether we drive our cars or not. We cannot stop it. Nor would we want to. Otherwise, a very interesting article
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me