Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

The Sun’s almost perfectly round shape baffles scientists

Scientists say that because the Sun doesn’t have a solid surface, it should be slightly flattened.
By University of Hawaii at Manoa's Institute for Astronomy, Honolulu Published: August 17, 2012
Sunspots
Image of the Sun taken by the Solar Dynamics Observatory. // Credit: NASA
The Sun is nearly the roundest object ever measured. If scaled to the size of a beach ball, it would be so round that the difference between the widest and narrow diameters would be much less than the width of a human hair.

The Sun rotates every 28 days, and because it doesn’t have a solid surface, it should be slightly flattened. This tiny flattening has been studied with many instruments for almost 50 years to learn about the Sun’s rotation, especially the rotation below its surface, which we can’t see directly.

Now Jeff Kuhn and Isabelle Scholl from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, Rock Bush from Stanford University in California, and Marcelo Emilio from the State University of Ponta Grossa in Brazil have used the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) aboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory satellite to obtain what they believe is the definitive — and baffling — answer.

Because there is no atmosphere in space to distort the solar image, they were able to use HMI’s exquisite image sensitivity to measure the solar shape with unprecedented accuracy. The results indicate that if the Sun were shrunk to a ball one meter in diameter, its equatorial diameter would be only 17 millionths of a meter larger than the diameter through its north-south pole, which is its rotation axis.

They also found that the solar flattening is remarkably constant over time and too small to agree with that predicted from its surface rotation. This suggests that other subsurface forces, like solar magnetism or turbulence, may be a more powerful influence than expected.

Kuhn, the team leader, said, “For years we’ve believed our fluctuating measurements were telling us that the Sun varies, but these new results say something different. While just about everything else in the Sun changes along with its 11-year sunspot cycle, the shape doesn’t.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
1 star
WAYNE LUKEY from AUSTRALIA (QLD) said:
Given both fluids and gas' when compressed form spheres I am at a loss to understand this article. What other shape would the Sun be? other than a perfect sphere? if gravity acts equally from all angles then the compression rats must form the gas into a perfect sphere, so why would it be slightly flattened?

To me this article does not make any scientific or logical sense.

Wayne.
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
The strangest thing is that is has a somewhat regular cycle of activity. If you didn't know it, and someone told you that a star changed over a short time period like 11 years, would you believe them? I would think that it would either changes constantly, randomly, or over millions of years as it fused elements, but not in roughly eleven year cycles. I would say, "What? Does it have a calendar inside there, and probably laugh?" When they explain that process, a lot of other observations might be explained. It is kind of weird when you think about it. It would be nice to be able to study other nearby stars and see if they act the same way. And to see if star size, age, or composition relates to the cycle length. It seems like it should. Does the density of dark matter near the star affect the cycle? They may have already done that, and I just don't know about it. I don't know about a lot.
They need to get those giant telescopes in Hawaii & Chile built. I wonder if you could construct a giant segmented mirror telescope in orbit, or at the Lagrange points? Moon dust would be too much of a problem on the lunar surface. That stuff gets everywhere and will scratch optical surfaces if you try to get it off. With adaptive optics, it might be more cost effective to build more telescopes on mountains (if you can keep the light pollution at bay) than to spend an enormous amount of money trying to build a big one in space.
Then again, as the fossil fuels start to run out, which will start to happen a lot sooner than most people now realize, non-essential exterior lights will start to get cut off. Some cities are already being forced to do so. It eliminates unnecessary air pollution too.
WILLIAM TISCH from ARIZONA said:
My understanding of the sun's dynamics was that the interior motion was primarily from the center to the surface (with the rising/cooling mass then circulating back to the center of course), rather than bodily rotation. Was I the only one under that impression? It would be consistent with the spherical shape.
4 stars
J GARY FOX from NEW JERSEY said:
"Always something new out of Mother Sol."

The recent publication by scientists of Purdue and Stanford of the effect of solar flares on rates of radioactive decay coupled with this "unexpected" finding demonstrates that we are only beginning to understand our nearest star.

On the possibility of neutrinos affecting decay rates ....

"It doesn't make sense according to conventional ideas," Fischbach said. Jenkins whimsically added,

"What we're suggesting is that something that doesn't really interact with anything is changing something that can't be changed."
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me