Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Astronomers crack mystery of the "monster stars"

A group of astronomers believe these ultramassive stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud were created from the merger of lighter stars in tight binary systems.
By Royal Astronomical Society, United Kingdom Published: August 7, 2012
Wolf-rayet-star
An image of the Wolf-Rayet star R136a1, the most massive star known. Credit: Wikipedia
R136
Using a combination of instruments on ESO's Very Large Telescope, astronomers have discovered the most massive stars to date, some weighing at birth more than 300 times the mass of the Sun, or twice as much as the currently accepted limit of 150 solar masses. The most extreme of these stars was found in the cluster R136 in the Tarantula Nebula. Named R136a1, it is found to have a current mass of 265 times that of the Sun. The origin of such monster stars is a challenge for the current understanding of star formation mechanisms.
Photo by ESO
In 2010, scientists discovered four monster-sized stars, with the heaviest more than 300 times as massive as our Sun. Despite their incredible luminosity, these exotic objects, located in the giant star cluster R136 in the nearby galaxy the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), have oddly been found nowhere else. Now a group of astronomers at the University of Bonn in Germany have a new explanation: The ultramassive stars were created from the merger of lighter stars in tight binary systems.

The LMC, at a distance of 160,000 light-years, is the third-nearest satellite of the Milky Way Galaxy and contains about 10 billion stars. The LMC has many star-forming regions, with the most active being the 1,000-light-year-diameter Tarantula Nebula where the four supermassive stars are found. This cloud of gas and dust is a highly fertile breeding ground of stars in the LMC and is also known as the 30 Doradus (30 Dor) complex. Near the center of 30 Dor is R136, by far the brightest stellar nursery not just in the LMC, but also in the entire Local Group of more than 50 galaxies and the site of the perplexing ultramassive stars.

Until the discovery of these objects in 2010, observations of the Milky Way and other galaxies suggested that the upper limit for stars formed in the present-day universe was about 150 times the mass of the Sun. This value represented a universal limit and appeared to apply wherever stars formed.

“Not only the upper mass limit, but the whole mass ingredient of any newborn assembly of stars appears identical irrespective of the stellar birthplace,” said Pavel Kroupa of the University of Bonn. “The star birth process seems to be universal.”

The newly discovered four ultrabright, ultramassive stars in R136 are quite an exception to this widely accepted limit. Does their discovery mean that the star birth in the 30 Dor region is happening in a very different way from elsewhere in the universe? If so, it would challenge the universal nature of the process of star formation, a fundamental premise of modern astronomy.

The Bonn group, also including lead investigator Sambaran Banerjee and team member Seungkyung Oh, modeled the interactions between stars in a R136-like cluster. Their computer simulation assembled the model cluster star by star, creating a cluster of more than 170,000 stars packed closely together. At the outset, Oh ensured that the stars were all of a normal mass and were distributed in the way expected.

To compute how even this relatively basic system changes over time, the model had to solve 510,000 equations many times over. The simulation is complicated by the effect of the nuclear reactions and, hence, energy released by each star and what happens when two stars happen to collide, a frequent event in such a crowded environment.

These highly intensive star-by-star calculations are known as “direct N-body simulations” and are the most reliable and accurate way to model clusters of stars. The Bonn researchers used the N-body integration code “NBODY6” and took advantage of the unprecedented hardware acceleration of video-gaming cards installed in otherwise ordinary workstations to fast forward their calculations.

“With all these ingredients, our R136 models are the most difficult and intensive N-body calculations ever made,” said Kroupa and Oh.

“Once these calculations were done, it quickly became clear that the ultramassive stars are no mystery,” added Banerjee. “They start appearing very early in the life of the cluster. With so many massive stars in tight binary pairs, there are frequent random encounters, some of which result in collisions where two stars coalesce into heavier objects. The resulting stars can then quite easily end up being as ultramassive as those seen in R136.”

“Imagine two bulky stars closely circling each other but where the duo gets pulled apart by the gravitational attraction from their neighboring stars,” Banerjee continued. “If their initially circular orbit is stretched enough, then the stars crash into each other as they pass and make a single ultramassive star.”

“Although extremely complicated physics is involved when two very massive stars collide, we still find it quite convincing that this explains the monster stars seen in the Tarantula,” Banerjee concluded.

“This helps us relax because the collisions mean that the ultramassive stars are a lot easier to explain” said Kroupa. “The universality of star formation prevails afterall.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL from UNITED KINGDOM said:
Presumably these supermassive stars will have very short lifespans as their luminosity (and therefore life as they rapidly burn out) goes up roughly as the cube of the mass. They will probably end up very soon by collapsing into black holes.
4 stars
CHRIS R BAKER from CALIFORNIA said:
It would amaze me if there were no Super massive stars like these located in the center of some of the larger globular clusters. We might not be able to see them due to the view being blocked by the other stars of the cluster.
3 stars
KEVIN L STARNES from COLORADO said:
This truly is a mystery but only a very small part of it has been solved. The explanation of how the "Monster Stars" in the LMC came to be is likely correct but why don't we see more of these behemoths in other regions? And why is it that only stars with a lighter mass merge into these monsters? These are the real mysteries!

When Kroupa says the "upper mass limit" he's being somewhat grandiose because what we know about the universe pales in comparison to what we don't know. Who would've thought that exoplanets would be discovered on nearly a daily basis? Who would've believed that giant lakes of hydrocarbons were possible until we actually saw them on Titan? The word "limit" might be best left out of discussions concerning our universe. Einstein's universal "speed limit" may turn out to be anything but limiting.
4 stars
RICHARD L COLE from MICHIGAN said:
And no where else in the nearby 150 million or so light years, or perhaps even farther?

Someone needs to explain the one-of-a-kind nature of the R136 scenario.
5 stars
SAM WALKER from CALIFORNIA said:
How can a star 300 times heavier than Sol maintain existence as a standard star?

As I have it, current theory strongly suggests that two, Sol sized, close binary stars will collapse into a Black Hole when one of the two captures mass from it’s companion and grows to a mass of 1.4 Sol.
How far off is my “understanding” (if there is any understanding for me)?
4 stars
CLIFFORD J DAVIS from KENTUCKY said:
I found this to be a facinating story and it's the first time I've heard about gaming technology being applied to physics studies at this level.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me