Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Hubble images searchlight beams from a preplanetary nebula

The preplanetary nebula phase is a short period in the cycle of stellar evolution, so there are relatively few of them in existence at any one time.
By NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland Published: April 30, 2012
Egg-nebula
The Egg Nebula. Credit: ESA/Hubble, NASA
The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope has been at the cutting edge of research into what happens to stars like our Sun at the ends of their lives. One stage that stars pass through as they run out of nuclear fuel is called the preplanetary or protoplanetary nebula stage. This Hubble image of the Egg Nebula shows one of the best views to date of this brief but dramatic phase in a star’s life.

The preplanetary nebula phase is a short period in the cycle of stellar evolution and has nothing to do with planets. Over a few thousand years, the hot remains of the aging star in the center of the nebula heat it up, excite the gas, and make it glow as a subsequent planetary nebula. The short lifespan of preplanetary nebulae means there are relatively few of them in existence at any one time. Moreover, they are very dim, requiring powerful telescopes to be seen. This combination of rarity and faintness means they were only discovered comparatively recently. The Egg Nebula, the first to be discovered, was first spotted less than 40 years ago, and many aspects of this class of object remain shrouded in mystery.

At the center of this image, and hidden in a thick cloud of dust, is the nebula’s central star. While we can’t see the star directly, four searchlight beams of light coming from it shine out through the nebula. It is thought that ring-shaped holes in the thick cocoon of dust, carved by jets coming from the star, let the beams of light emerge through the otherwise opaque cloud. The precise mechanism by which stellar jets produce these holes is not known for certain, but one possible explanation is that a binary star system, rather than a single star, exists at the center of the nebula.

The onion-like layered structure of the more diffuse cloud surrounding the central cocoon is caused by periodic bursts of material being ejected from the dying star. The bursts typically occur every few hundred years.

The distance to the Egg Nebula is only known approximately, with the best guess placing it at around 3,000 light-years from Earth. This, in turn, means that astronomers do not have any accurate figures for the size of the nebula — it may be larger and farther away, or smaller but nearer.

This image is produced from exposures in visible and infrared light from Hubble’s Wide Field Camera 3.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
JOSEPH PAXTON SR from COLORADO said:
I hope that astronomy continues with a bigger better Hubble 2. There is so much more to be learned and we all love the wonderful pictures that were provided to the public.
3 stars
BRUCE A SINTON said:
Dear John,
Historical value couldn't match cash required to bring it back.
In a decade or two we will regret that we didn't bring it back.

We don't really appreciate something until we have lost it.
4 stars
GERARDO W FISCHER said:
This image and report show that what is observed with good instrumentation and interpreted with wits never disappoints compared to pure imagination.
4 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL said:
In answer to Mr Bankston, the HST is still in good form and doing great science after its last refurbishment, hopefully for some years yet. It is better for it to 'die in harness' than to end up before its time in a museum. The real tragedy is the loss of the Shuttles themselves, irreplaceable assets prematurely sent off to various museums.
JOHN R BANKSTON from NORTH CAROLINA said:
We will miss the Hubble Space telescope.
Why couldn't NASA have brought it back with one of the last
Shuttle missions? It has historical value beyound measure.

RB
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me